US Politics: Bike tricks

quovadis

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 10, 2004
Messages
11,028
Lol, you poor snowflake. Always the victim. You completely missed the point, constructed your own strawman and then proceeded to fight it.
Nope. I added the number of years and asked two questions. Get over yourself.
 

Gnarls

Expert Member
Joined
May 20, 2008
Messages
4,907
Nope. I added the number of years and asked two questions. Get over yourself.

Dude, as evidenced by the post below, you didn't even know wtf you were responding to. Now sit down and shut up junior!

So the economic impact in terms of welfare is unimportant and a strawman argument. Odd.

Your strawman again.

You talking about the impact in terms of economic welfare is rich given that Chuck Schumer said:

Schumer: "We have a population that is not reproducing on its own with the same level that it used to. The only way we’re going to have a great future is if we welcome immigrants… get a path to citizenship for all 11 million [illegal immigrants].”

Lol, I guess he's not referring to the economy. You may want to try to comprehend what he was saying along with Temujin's response again.

:laugh::

Rekt.
 

quovadis

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 10, 2004
Messages
11,028
Dude, as evidenced by the post below, you didn't even know wtf you were responding to. Now sit down and shut up junior!

Rekt.
As evidenced by what?!? Perhaps go read my post that triggered you to begin with and reevaluate.
 

Gnarls

Expert Member
Joined
May 20, 2008
Messages
4,907
As evidenced by what?!? Perhaps go read my post that triggered you to begin with and reevaluate.

Nope and the only one triggered here is you.

The point (of Temujin's post, and he's welcome to correct me) was the hypocrisy of Chuck Schumer stanning for abortion while at the same time saying we aren't reproducing enough but I'm sure you totally understood that what with your totally on point and relevant counter argument that Republicans are anti welfare (another claim with buggerall source)

This clown.
 

quovadis

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 10, 2004
Messages
11,028
Nope and the only one triggered here is you.

The point (of Temujin's post, and he's welcome to correct me) was the hypocrisy of Chuck Schumer stanning for abortion while at the same time saying we aren't reproducing enough but I'm sure you totally understood that what with your totally on point and relevant counter argument that Republicans are anti welfare (another claim with buggerall source)

This clown.
I'm not triggered. And I'm completely aware of his point - I was attempting to expand the conversation which triggered your whole strawman, goal posts & white knighting.
 

Gnarls

Expert Member
Joined
May 20, 2008
Messages
4,907
Pretty sure it didn't need fixing but if that's how you counter then sure. Well done.

But you haven't countered @Temujin's original point. Instead you've tried to "expand" the conversation by talking about Republicans when Chuck Schumer was the person quoted.

Just pointing out that you are wrong and leaving it at that.

Not going to do the 500 posts of you doing the…
View attachment 1423755

Oh look, someone else calling you out on your bs.

Am I wrong about you shifting goal posts?

But I'm sure we're all wrong and you, you're right.

:laugh:
 

quovadis

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 10, 2004
Messages
11,028
But you haven't countered @Temujin's original point. Instead you've tried to "expand" the conversation by talking about Republicans when Chuck Schumer was the person quoted.
Oh look, someone else calling you out on your bs.
But I'm sure we're all wrong and you, you're right.

:laugh:
I think I explained the context of my questions. I'm sorry you are so committed to calling me out. You are the winner.
 

Hamish McPanji

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 29, 2009
Messages
42,084
A real man writes his own notes for his speech with a giant marker.

Completely different than what Joe Biden has and I can't elaborate because it is beneath me to make fun of old people.

Yes, as Sharpie gate proved to us.

Maybe Trump did need these notes. Remember how he manhandled European leaders to try and get in front.

The best thing, is the Trumpites have nothing. Simply because we've seen it all before now
 

Pegasus

Honorary Master
Joined
May 17, 2004
Messages
13,973
But you haven't countered @Temujin's original point. Instead you've tried to "expand" the conversation by talking about Republicans when Chuck Schumer was the person quoted.



Oh look, someone else calling you out on your bs.



But I'm sure we're all wrong and you, you're right.

:laugh:
I also predicted he would carry on for 500 posts because he sure as Fisk won’t admit when he is wrong.
 

rietrot

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 26, 2016
Messages
33,196
One amazing thing that might come out of the "red ripple" (have to use this term it is the official term for past midterm elections) is that some Bush idiot number IV might just run again.
 

Gnarls

Expert Member
Joined
May 20, 2008
Messages
4,907
I think I explained the context of my questions. I'm sorry you are so committed to calling me out. You are the winner.

What context? Since you got the point please explain you how you reconcile his position on abortion with his current quote?

No Republicans or welfare as they are not part of the point made.
I think I explained the context of my questions. I'm sorry you are so committed to calling me out. You are the winner.

:ROFL:

Get over yourself.
 

Hamish McPanji

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 29, 2009
Messages
42,084
One amazing thing that might come out of the "red ripple" (have to use this term it is the official term for past midterm elections) is that some Bush idiot number IV might just run again.
Red tsunami, wave , ripple , whatever ..... why would that have made a difference to whether Bush ran or not?.
 

quovadis

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 10, 2004
Messages
11,028
What context? Since you got the point please explain you how you reconcile his position on abortion with his current quote?

No Republicans or welfare as they are not part of the point made.
My posts are above. If they don't meet your level of "not a strawman" that's fine and you're right.
 
Top