Nope. I added the number of years and asked two questions. Get over yourself.Lol, you poor snowflake. Always the victim. You completely missed the point, constructed your own strawman and then proceeded to fight it.
Nope. I added the number of years and asked two questions. Get over yourself.Lol, you poor snowflake. Always the victim. You completely missed the point, constructed your own strawman and then proceeded to fight it.
Nope. I added the number of years and asked two questions. Get over yourself.
So the economic impact in terms of welfare is unimportant and a strawman argument. Odd.
Your strawman again.
You talking about the impact in terms of economic welfare is rich given that Chuck Schumer said:
Schumer: "We have a population that is not reproducing on its own with the same level that it used to. The only way we’re going to have a great future is if we welcome immigrants… get a path to citizenship for all 11 million [illegal immigrants].”
Lol, I guess he's not referring to the economy. You may want to try to comprehend what he was saying along with Temujin's response again.
:
As evidenced by what?!? Perhaps go read my post that triggered you to begin with and reevaluate.Dude, as evidenced by the post below, you didn't even know wtf you were responding to. Now sit down and shut up junior!
Rekt.
As evidenced by what?!? Perhaps go read my post that triggered you to begin with and reevaluate.
I'm not triggered. And I'm completely aware of his point - I was attempting to expand the conversation which triggered your whole strawman, goal posts & white knighting.Nope and the only one triggered here is you.
The point (of Temujin's post, and he's welcome to correct me) was the hypocrisy of Chuck Schumer stanning for abortion while at the same time saying we aren't reproducing enough but I'm sure you totally understood that what with your totally on point and relevant counter argument that Republicans are anti welfare (another claim with buggerall source)
This clown.
I'm triggered. And I'm completely aware of his point - I was attempting to shift the goalposts.
Pretty sure it didn't need fixing but if that's how you counter then sure. Well done.FTFY
Pretty sure it didn't need fixing but if that's how you counter then sure. Well done.
Just pointing out that you are wrong and leaving it at that.
Not going to do the 500 posts of you doing the…
View attachment 1423755
Am I wrong about you shifting goal posts?
I think I explained the context of my questions. I'm sorry you are so committed to calling me out. You are the winner.But you haven't countered @Temujin's original point. Instead you've tried to "expand" the conversation by talking about Republicans when Chuck Schumer was the person quoted.
Oh look, someone else calling you out on your bs.
But I'm sure we're all wrong and you, you're right.
![]()
A real man writes his own notes for his speech with a giant marker.
Completely different than what Joe Biden has and I can't elaborate because it is beneath me to make fun of old people.
I also predicted he would carry on for 500 posts because he sure as Fisk won’t admit when he is wrong.But you haven't countered @Temujin's original point. Instead you've tried to "expand" the conversation by talking about Republicans when Chuck Schumer was the person quoted.
Oh look, someone else calling you out on your bs.
But I'm sure we're all wrong and you, you're right.
![]()
He's not wrong. You're bringing up something historical by a few individuals to explain away recent decades of policy.Just pointing out that you are wrong and leaving it at that.
Not going to do the 500 posts of you doing the…
View attachment 1423755
I think I explained the context of my questions. I'm sorry you are so committed to calling me out. You are the winner.
I think I explained the context of my questions. I'm sorry you are so committed to calling me out. You are the winner.
Get over yourself.
Red tsunami, wave , ripple , whatever ..... why would that have made a difference to whether Bush ran or not?.One amazing thing that might come out of the "red ripple" (have to use this term it is the official term for past midterm elections) is that some Bush idiot number IV might just run again.
My posts are above. If they don't meet your level of "not a strawman" that's fine and you're right.What context? Since you got the point please explain you how you reconcile his position on abortion with his current quote?
No Republicans or welfare as they are not part of the point made.
They are now convinced Trump's time is over and have received plenty of fake support from the left.Red tsunami, wave , ripple , whatever ..... why would that have made a difference to whether Bush ran or not?.
My posts are above. If they don't meet your level of "not a strawman" that's fine and you're right.
But that’s not all….Indications are that Pelosi's speech in a few moments will indicate she is quitting as House minority leader.
Thank heavens, the gerontocracy is finally retiring!