US Politics: Bike tricks

[quovadis]

No, this was the point. Which you supposedly got. Please put up or shut up.

I'll say it again since you cannot drop it. You are right. You win. There's no point trying to convince you otherwise.

 

[Gnarls]

I'll say it again since you cannot drop it. You are right. You win. There's no point trying to convince you otherwise.

Poor snowflake being victimized by the guy who wouldn't drop it. The only thing I'm convinced of is your eagerness to dunk on Republicans led you to completely miss the point and you're now trying to save face by passive aggressively painting me as someone who won't drop it.

Seems to by your MO. The record speaks for itself. Stay strong little trooper.

 

[quovadis]

But that’s not all….

They should investigate but they might want to tone down the rhetoric and reach conclusions as part of the investigation rather than presenting them from the outset.

 

[quovadis]

Poor snowflake being victimized by the guy who wouldn't drop it. The only thing I'm convinced of is your eagerness to dunk on Republicans led you to completely miss the point and you're now trying to save face by passive aggressively painting me as someone who won't drop it.

Seems to by your MO. The record speaks for itself. Stay strong little trooper.

You're not dropping it.

 

[Gnarls]

You're not dropping it.

More snowflakery.

lokl this guy.

 

[Pegasus]

They should investigate but they might want to tone down the rhetoric and reach conclusions as part of the investigation rather than presenting them from the outset.

Its hard for the row in the back to contain their smiles.
Jim has his yellow tie on and no jacket, so he is in his element,

I’m sure this will be as unbiased as the democrats investigation s were.

 

[Gnarls]

Its hard for the row in the back to contain their smiles.
Jim has his yellow tie on and no jacket, so he is in his element,

I’m sure this will be as unbiased as the democrats investigation s were.

Yeah, the ones where they toned down the rhetoric and didn't present their conclusions from the outset.

 

[ShaunSA]

They should investigate but they might want to tone down the rhetoric and reach conclusions as part of the investigation rather than presenting them from the outset.

You're talking about politicians right?

 

[Pegasus]

Yeah, the ones where they toned down the rhetoric and didn't present their conclusions from the outset.

Yeah, this what they are doing. Jim looked really happy on his way out. Probably lots of high fives on the other side of the door after they left.

Guess Joe Biden’s first impeachment will be around May 2023.

Unless MTG beats this committee to it.

 

[Hamish McPanji]

They are now convinced Trump's time is over and have received plenty of fake support from the left.

So you think that if it was a red wave, Bush would have competed? After last time?

Did you convince yourself of that, or one of those websites you visit told you?

 

[quovadis]

passive aggressively painting me as someone who won't drop it.

You're not dropping it.

More snowflakery.

lokl this guy.

 

[quovadis]

You're talking about politicians right?

Lol unfortunately yes. I miss the days where some level of decorum existed or at least it was more toned down. And for clarity - all sides.

 

[The_Right_Honourable_Brit]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1593252809948139520

Trafalgar is a crap pollster. They fluked 2020 IMO.

 

[quovadis]

Its hard for the row in the back to contain their smiles.
Jim has his yellow tie on and no jacket, so he is in his element,

I’m sure this will be as unbiased as the democrats investigation s were.

Jim does seem super excited. I'd hope they'd hold themselves to a higher level but I suspect that won't be the case. It does seem that they're not quite sure what will stick so its basically regurgitation of every Hunter Biden laptop sound bite for the past few years so it'll be interesting to see the public response to this.

 

[Gnarls]

Still making stupid posts instead of answering the question put to you?

So, your MO in short. Miss the point but dunk on republicans then when you're called out on your bs, claim you got the point but were "expanding" the conversation. Then when you're asked point blank to answer the actual point with no "expansion" of the conversion

"Please drop it. You win."

But you expect not to be ridiculed snowflake?

 

[Gnarls]

Jim does seem super excited. I'd hope they'd hold themselves to a higher level but I suspect that won't be the case. It does seem that they're not quite sure what will stick so its basically regurgitation of every Hunter Biden laptop sound bite for the past few years so it'll be interesting to see the public response to this.

Maybe you should let the investigations run their course and reach conclusions as part of the investigation rather than presenting them from the outset.

They should investigate but they might want to tone down the rhetoric and reach conclusions as part of the investigation rather than presenting them from the outset.

 

[quovadis]

Still making stupid posts instead of answering the question put to you?

So, your MO in short. Miss the point but dunk on republicans then when you're called out on your bs, claim you got the point but were "expanding" the conversation. Then when you're asked point blanks to answer the actual point.

"Please drop it. You win."

But you expect not to be ridiculed?

Ridicule away if that's what you want.

 

[quovadis]

Maybe you should let the investigations run their course and reach conclusion conclusions as part of the investigation rather than presenting them from the outset.

I didn't present a conclusion if that's what you're inferring and yes - that's what I said "Let them investigate"

 

[Gnarls]

Ridicule away if that's what you want.

Yeah, no. My mother told me not to make fun of idiots like you.

I didn't present a conclusion if that's what you're inferring and yes - that's what I said "Let them investigate"

Your silence during the sham impeachments when precisely this was done is deafening. Strange how you're expect a higher level from Republicans but you can't even explain Chucky's hypocrisy without invoking muh Republicans.

Leftards gonna leftard I guess.

 

[quovadis]

Yeah, no. My mother told me not to make fun of idiots like you.

Your mother should be proud of your interaction.

Your silence during the sham impeachments when precisely this was done is deafening. Strange how you're expect a higher level from Republicans but you can't even explain Chucky's hypocrisy without invoking muh Republicans.

You say that like I'm accountable for the Democrat's impeachment of Donald Trump, twice. I respect the process and the same will apply for the latest chapter. It's not strange at all - if the Republicans have criticised the Democrats' process then I'd hope they'd take the higher road or not - that's not hypocritical of me.

Leftards gonna leftard I guess.

Can't help yourself.