US Politics: Bike tricks

[Gnarls]

You say that like I'm accountable for the Democrat's impeachment of Donald Trump, twice. I respect the process and the same will apply for the latest chapter. It's not strange at all - if the Republicans have criticised the Democrats' process then I'd hope they'd take the higher road or not - that's not hypocritical of me.

Your strawman again. I never said you're accountable just that your silence is deafening.

Do you ever argue the point?

 

[quovadis]

Your strawman again. I never said you're accountable just that your silence is deafening.

Was I here and if so do I have a duty to comment on everything?

 

[rvZA]

Nancy Pelosi will not seek re-election as leader of the House Democrats​

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced she will not seek re-election as leader of the House Democratic Conference after nearly 20 years at the helm, after Democrats narrowly lost the majority in the chamber during the midterm elections.

"With great confidence in our caucus, I will not seek re-election to Democratic leadership in the next Congress," said Pelosi. "For me, the hour has come for a new generation to lead the Democratic caucus that I so deeply respect, and I'm grateful that so many are ready and willing to shoulder this awesome responsibility."

"There is no greater special honor for me than to stand on this floor and to speak for the people of San Francisco. This I will continue to do as a member of the House speaking for the people of San Francisco, serving the great state of California and defending our Constitution," she continued.

Nancy Pelosi will not seek re-election as leader of the House Democrats

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi made a decision about her future plans Thursday after the Democrats lost their majority in the chamber after the midterm elections.

www.foxnews.com

Now investigate and prosecute her and her husband. Treasonous f**kers!

 

[Pegasus]

Jim does seem super excited. I'd hope they'd hold themselves to a higher level but I suspect that won't be the case. It does seem that they're not quite sure what will stick so its basically regurgitation of every Hunter Biden laptop sound bite for the past few years so it'll be interesting to see the public response to this.

Yep. Both sides do it. And always will.

 

[Gnarls]

Was I here and if so do I have a duty to comment on everything?

Evidently, you were. You want another side to hold themselves to a higher standard yet your still dead quiet on the hypocrisy shown to you earlier.

Come now Trigglypuff!

 

[quovadis]

Evidently, you were. You want another side to hold themselves to a higher standard yet your still dead quiet on the hypocrisy shown to you earlier.

Come now Trigglypuff!

My silence is deafening? I wasn’t asked my opinion nor offered it on Chucky but my opinion on house oversight is that it’s a process which should be respected. As for the higher standard i think I clarified it when I stated that

if the Republicans have criticised the Democrats' process then I'd hope they'd take the higher road or not

Now explain this duty I have to give an opinion else my silence is deafening?

 

[Gnarls]

My silence is deafening? I wasn’t asked my opinion nor offered it on Chucky but my opinion on house oversight is that it’s a process which should be respected. As for the higher standard i think I clarified it when I stated that



Now explain this duty I have to give an opinion else my silence is deafening?

Lol you got the point that @Temujin was making but you weren't asked nor offered your opinion when you quoted his post?

 

[cerebus]

My silence is deafening? I wasn’t asked my opinion nor offered it on Chucky but my opinion on house oversight is that it’s a process which should be respected. As for the higher standard i think I clarified it when I stated that



Now explain this duty I have to give an opinion else my silence is deafening?

You realize you're arguing with he patron saint of pigeon chess, right? Gnarls has mastered the art of troll debating.

 

[quovadis]

Lol you got the point that @Temujin was making but you weren't asked nor offered your opinion when you quoted his post?

Straw man. But it’s great to know that you think everyone registered before a certain date and doesn’t offer an opinion or position on every topic infers something to you on that topic because their silence is deafening.

 

[quovadis]

You realize you're arguing with he patron saint of pigeon chess, right? Gnarls has mastered the art of troll debating.

It’s hard to keep up.

 

[Temujin]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1593310309762174983

Somethingsomethingthreattonationalsecurityanddemocracysomething

 

[quovadis]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1593310309762174983

Somethingsomethingthreattonationalsecurityanddemocracysomething

So balance to the force is restored? Is it official?

 

[Gnarls]

You realize you're arguing with he patron saint of pigeon chess, right? Gnarls has mastered the art of troll debating.

So help your boy out. How is this:

Over 50 years. It is a problem if the majority of those needed welfare? Republicans don’t quite love food stamps and welfare, do they?

In any way related to the original point here.

60million+ abortions over the years, thats basically the entire population of south africa wiped out... 'reproduction' isn't the problem here chuck

And when you're done with that, please explain how is this trolling?

Can you please argue the point and not the strawman you're trying to introduce?

Read below, his own logic has him twisted in pretzels.

So the economic impact in terms of welfare is unimportant and a strawman argument. Odd.

Your strawman again.

You talking about the impact in terms of economic welfare is rich given that Chuck Schumer said:

Schumer: "We have a population that is not reproducing on its own with the same level that it used to. The only way we’re going to have a great future is if we welcome immigrants… get a path to citizenship for all 11 million [illegal immigrants].”

Lol, I guess he's not referring to the economy. You may want to try to comprehend what he was saying along with Temujin's response again.

 

[quovadis]

So help your boy out. How is this …
Read below, his own logic has him twisted in pretzels.

Pretty sure he can read the thread himself.

 

[Gnarls]

Pretty sure he can read the thread himself.

Good Lawd, you don't know how a forum works either?

 

[quovadis]

Good Lawd, you don't know how a forum works either?

Admittedly I am learning tonight. So far -1) I have to give an opinion on everything since my registration date or else it infers something and 2) I am not allowed to pose questions to posts if they are in anyway expansive to the discussion. 3) I also have to resort to name calling and have to throw in rekt and ‘tards to hammer my point home.

 

[Gnarls]

Admittedly I am learning tonight. So far -1) I have to give an opinion on everything since my registration date or else it infers something and 2) I am not allowed to pose questions to posts if they are in anyway expansive to the discussion. 3) I also have to resort to name calling and have to throw in rekt and ‘tards to hammer my point home.

Yoh, no one said this. You just don't ever argue the point as stated in my original post. Not to mention @Pegasus called you out too but nooooooooo.........

Your victim complex is showing snowflake.

 

[quovadis]

Yoh, no one said this. You just don't ever argue the point as stated in my original post. Not to mention @Pegasus called you out too but nooooooooo.........

Your victim complex is showing snowflake.

You’re totally lost in your own conflated argument. Pigeon chess indeed. Its been fun.

 

[Gnarls]

You’re totally lost in your own conflated argument. Pigeon chess indeed. Its been fun.

Nope again. My objection was very easy to understand. Here it is again.

Can you please argue the point and not the strawman you're trying to introduce?

lol

Pretty sure they can read the thread themselves.

Toodles numbnuts.

 

[quovadis]

Toodles numbnuts.

Au revoir Pigeon