US Politics: Bike tricks

[tetrasect]

 

[tetrasect]

This is what Trump means when he says he is "winning in the polls".

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639408087256948736

 

[Temujin]

 

[tetrasect]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639644436001968128

 

[Dave]

 

[tetrasect]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639669064661360643

 

[tetrasect]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639779802025426946

 

[Kieppie]

Not even elections yet and TDS is already in full swing it seems

 

[Ponderer]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639779802025426946

It would be very interesting if both Trump and Biden had a (live televised) mental competency test showdown.
I wonder if Biden would agree to something of the sorts.

 

[Ponderer]

Not even elections yet and TDS is already in full swing it seems

Apparently there is no such thing as TDS.
Sam Harris says so.

 

[tetrasect]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639673320948785157

 

[Kieppie]

View attachment 1498573

So Dems want to diddle toddlers and Reps want to diddle teenagers. Gotcha

 

[tetrasect]

So Dems want to diddle toddlers and Reps want to diddle teenagers. Gotcha

At least 60,000 child marriages in the U.S. between 2000 and 2018 occurred at an age or with a spousal age difference that should have been considered statutory rape.

How many drag queens have "diddled toddlers" between 2000 and 2018?

 

[Kieppie]

At least 60,000 child marriages in the U.S. between 2000 and 2018 occurred at an age or with a spousal age difference that should have been considered statutory rape.

How many drag queens have "diddled toddlers" between 2000 and 2018?

Ah yes marriage is worse than diddling toddlers.
Why so eager to expose toddlers to sexual content? I get that some people are just groomers, but I thought it was bad painting all Dems with the same brush.

Go do a breakdown of where there is a significant difference between the two parties. Those are the only ones where one can claim that it's problematic.
Allowing 16 years olds to marry is far less worrisome than guys thrusting their junk into the faces of children, but you do you.

 

[Ponderer]

At least 60,000 child marriages in the U.S. between 2000 and 2018 occurred at an age or with a spousal age difference that should have been considered statutory rape.

How many drag queens have "diddled toddlers" between 2000 and 2018?

Ah yes - there is obviously nothing wrong with a man that dresses as a lewd woman that gets a sexual kick from performing like a lewd woman in front of innocent kids.
How daaaaare you discriminate against the mentally ill.

 

[tetrasect]

Ah yes marriage is worse than diddling toddlers.
Why so eager to expose toddlers to sexual content? I get that some people are just groomers, but I thought it was bad painting all Dems with the same brush.

Go do a breakdown of where there is a significant difference between the two parties. Those are the only ones where one can claim that it's problematic.
Allowing 16 years olds to marry is far less worrisome than guys thrusting their junk into the faces of children, but you do you.

If you're just talking marriages under the age of 18 then it's over 300,000, of which 5 were 10 years old, 1 was 11 years old, 14 were 12 years old, 78 were 13 years old, 1223 were 14 years old and 8199 were 15 years old.

 

[Kieppie]

If you're just talking marriages under the age of 18 then it's over 300,000.

Yes and? I'm talking about example of someone in their 30's marrying someone under 16. Then we can start arguing how it is the same or worse than "Drag Queen grooming".

You are aware that you are arguing against the first amendment, that's basically the only thing the Republicans in that ill-informed meme are upholding.
There isn't a nationwide push by Republicans to normalise teen marriages, but there is such a push amongst Dems to normalise child grooming it seems.

 

[tetrasect]

Ah yes - there is obviously nothing wrong with a man that dresses as a lewd woman that gets a sexual kick from performing like a lewd woman in front of innocent kids.
How daaaaare you discriminate against the mentally ill.

You sound mentally ill. Have you considered the fact that reading a children's book to a class of kids does not give anyone a "sexual kick" and that you're projecting your own twisted sexual insecurities into the situation?

 

[rietrot]

At least 60,000 child marriages in the U.S. between 2000 and 2018 occurred at an age or with a spousal age difference that should have been considered statutory rape.

How many drag queens have "diddled toddlers" between 2000 and 2018?

This is just factually fals or I would like to see the leftist blog were you got the information from.

1. Any marriage were one person is under 18 is considered as marriage to a minor.
2. The age of consent is between 16-18 depending on the state.

So I bet you obviously don't see a problem with this, but it kinda is for people that think you should be married before you have sex.

 

[tetrasect]

Yes and? I'm talking about example of someone in their 30's marrying someone under 16. Then we can start arguing how it is the same or worse than "Drag Queen grooming".

You are aware that you are arguing against the first amendment, that's basically the only thing the Republicans in that ill-informed meme are upholding.
There isn't a nationwide push by Republicans to normalise teen marriages, but there is such a push amongst Dems to normalise child grooming it seems.

So anyone under 30 years of age should be allowed to marry a kid under the age of 16 (even 10 year olds are fair game, right?), but a man dressed in woman's clothing should not be allowed to read a children's book in front of a class of school kids?