Yeah and?
Just imagine what they have in the NY one.
Curious how far a partisan jury can tip the scales in cases where the preponderance of evidence show innocence, never mind reasonable doubt.
We have Stormy with her written signed testimony that the alleged affair never happened, then she claimed her signature was forged, then her lawyer said no it's true, then eventually said she felt forced to lie due to the money. Extremely trustworthy woman this.
Then we have Cohen who in an unsealed letter specifically state that it wasn't Trump that paid any money.
There is a reason lawyers say this case is extremely weak...
Add to this whole shebang the statute of limitations and you get a right mess.
Watching this unfold will be very entertaining
My only gripe, beside wasting time & money, is that this will distract the sheeple from actual news events.