Tell us more please. Who voted for who?clearly see that the votes were predominately race based
Tell us more please. Who voted for who?clearly see that the votes were predominately race based
Go check yourself, you clearly have enough free time to waste.Tell us more please. Who voted for who?
Nah I'm curious as to what you mean by "the votes were predominately race based".Go check yourself, you clearly have enough free time to waste.
The only real deviation came from white progressives that voted for Johnson.
Curious why you are so surprised by this tendency?
Not sure how they don't get how and when financial statements are prepared or that there's two matters here. One is the accounting entries which obfuscate the payments made in the period before the elections.
Going by districts and their demographics, predominantlyNah I'm curious as to what you mean by "the votes were predominately race based".
You clearly don't understand over/under-representation nor that registered voters don't turnout at equal ratios to their ward or even their precinct demographics.Going by districts and their demographics, predominantly
Hispanics voted for Jesús G. García
African American voted for Lori Lightfoot and Brandon Johnson
Whites voted for Paul Vallas
How is that a difficult concept?
You can use the interactive map from this article to go check.
![]()
Chicago Mayor Election Results
See full results and maps from the 2023 Chicago mayoral election.www.nytimes.com
Yup. The fringe circus is real on all sides. Google Crackhead Barney. So-called "performance art"/satire.
You clearly don't understand the simplicity in the average voters decision making. In group preference is a thing (ironically except with progressive whites).You clearly don't understand over/under-representation nor that registered voters don't turnout at equal ratios to their ward or even their precinct demographics.
Yeah it's not that simple. Your mindset is off.You clearly don't understand the simplicity in the average voters decision making. In group preference is a thing (ironically except with progressive whites).
Your overcomplicating a simple trend.
You're ignoring the biggest factor to focus on lesser factors.Yeah it's not that simple. Your mindset is off.
Funny that in the primary if you look at the vote heat map you can clearly see that the votes were predominately race based.
Vallas would have been a better mayor, but they made their beds. Question is, will he be worse than Beetlejuice?
Nah I'm curious as to what you mean by "the votes were predominately race based".
You're ignoring the biggest factor to focus on lesser factors.
So yeah Johnson won because of identity politics.
And yet overwhelmingly the north east wards which are some of the highest predominantly white wards were won by Johnson.It is as simple as blacks voting for the progressive, mostly whites voting for the other guy and Hispanics being the only group where there was not a strong preference for one or the other.
Your lack of reading comprehension is astounding... Or perhaps it's the lack of understanding of the different wards?And yet overwhelmingly the north east wards which are some of the highest predominantly white wards were won by Johnson.
You mean this:Your lack of reading comprehension is astounding... Or perhaps it's the lack of understanding of the different wards?
Go re-read my original message.
They didn't in the north east...Whites voted for Paul Vallas
And yet overwhelmingly the north east wards which are some of the highest predominantly white wards were won by Johnson.
www.nbcchicago.com
www.nbcchicago.com
www.nbcchicago.com
Guess you missed this part?You mean this:
They didn't in the north east...