Gnarls
Expert Member
- Joined
- May 20, 2008
- Messages
- 4,907
What metric should we be looking at in addition to this one?
What metric should we be looking at in addition to this one?
Ignore them, they're just desperate to fluff Biden up for something he played no part in.Economic indicator - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Agreed.Regardless of who is responsible, those are still impressive numbers and reinforce the US as an economic juggernaut, compared to the anemic growth in the "Old World" (Europe) with its massive bureaucracy. It's no accident that the centre of innovation remains the US and not Europe.
Economic indicator - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
What has that got to do with jobs and unemployment?
Ignore them, they're just desperate to fluff Biden up for something he played no part in.
It's been like that since he took office.
Perhaps look closer at the data. Also, Americans are not all employeesBwhahahaha no it's not but keep licking Biden's boots why don't you, you utter clown.
It's still at 62.6%. ie under what it was pre Covid.
I think he might have had something to do with it
![]()
This.Regardless of who is responsible, those are still impressive numbers and reinforce the US as an economic juggernaut, compared to the anemic growth in the "Old World" (Europe) with its massive bureaucracy. It's no accident that the centre of innovation remains the US and not Europe.
It's the world's top food exporter, one of the top LNG exporters now and #1 petroleum producer.
Not completely - it still could’ve still been managed better. Obama for all those who criticise him was given a lemon, not of his own making, and faired pretty well to avoid what could have been far worse.It is a largely meaningless comparison given the evolution of the pandemic and the timing of when Biden was inaugurated. Definitely not a like-for-like comparison.
It is a largely meaningless comparison given the evolution of the pandemic and the timing of when Biden was inaugurated. Definitely not a like-for-like comparison. I'm 99% positive that Trump's job numbers were largely in the positive before covid-19 as I can't recall a major negative economic event occurring between 2016-2019 and my US shares were going up as well.
Ah right on time. Enters a typical person with zero understanding of the underlying issues, exemplifying the problem with said lack of understanding.I think he might have had something to do with it
![]()
If he wanted to compare the numbers he should compare the same numbers not cherry pick ones.Perhaps look closer at the data. Also, Americans are not all employeesthe balance is mostly entrepreneurs and small and medium business owners which aren’t counted as employees and don’t draw salaries.
They’ve used the jobs metric for years - it’s universal, not cherry picking.If he wanted to compare the numbers he should compare the same numbers not cherry pick ones.
If I wanted to be pedantic about certain age groups then I'd mention a rising trend of longer tertiary education or concentrated deaths due to Covid in the older demographics.
But why go into such details when the basics are still not even addressed properly.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Lol no. That is 100% COVIDI think he might have had something to do with it
![]()
Ah right on time. Enters a typical person with zero understanding of the underlying issues, exemplifying the problem with said lack of understanding.
Congratulations!![]()
Yes because "X new jobs created" is easy to understand for everyone. It doesn't mean it's meaningful on it's own.They’ve used the jobs metric for years - it’s universal, not cherry picking.
Jobs actually created is typically a good thing, jobs being reopened is merely going back to status quo.All I know is I lived through four years of Trump and his acolytes bragging incessantly about his job numbers.
etc etc etc.
Personally I never thought job numbers are the best measure of economic health and the US has much bigger unaddressed problems related to quality of life, but since jobs are the metric used by Trumpies, here we are.