Pretty sure they’ve been moved to an appropriate shelter like every other asylum seeker. Venezuelan asylum seekers aren’t illegals under current law and can even fly into the country on expired passports.
Sanctuary City policies were actually initiated and championed by conservatives and Republicans like Reagan and Bush in the 80s back when they had some shred of decency and cared about actual outcomes for their constituents.
Correct and the irony is they’ve strayed so far from those values that don’t even realise it.
Don't be fooled, they do realise it. It is all very deliberate.
Yep. Every sane person in the world is laughing at the hypocrisy, but sure lets pretend that it's "inhumane" or "racist" same old, same old.
Massive difference between an illegal alien and a legitimate asylum seeker, which is why there has been a concerted effort to try and remove the usage of illegal aliens and conflating it with terms like refugee or migrant.
Interesting. Where does Texas and Florida rank in terms of state tax collection per capita? Would you say that more blue states or red states are the biggest takers of federal spending?
Not really - every sane person understands what happens when politicians takes a bunch of people to somewhere ill-prepared to deal with them and without advanced notice.
Class. No counter? Surely if you have a positive balance of payments you shouldn’t be complaining about where the money is being spent if it’s with you ?!
Kinda like border states were forced to do. So I guess those places will just need to adapt.
I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt to know why I say that is a strawman. It's been argued so many times it's irrelevant at this point.
I don’t understand. Are you not aware Texas received funding for this purpose? Many of those border towns also only exist because of the jobs related to that funding?
If it’s irrelevant to discuss tax contributions but not how it’s spent? Come now.
The funding is miniscule compared to the problems of illegals outnumbering the population of actual towns down there.
Yes since state industries and hence tax income differ. Which is why the electoral college should never be abolished.
Think you should look at the number of facilities and shelters scattered throughout the US which these migrants are detained or given shelter. It’s already spread around.
Pretty sure the GOP loves the electoral college since they're net winners under it?
Here's a thought for you. I'm going to dump 1000 migrants from Moz in your back yard, give you a R1000 a month, then you have to feed, shelter them, give them medical care or we'll come down on you ...
Sign up with Google