Definitely not "beyond QAnon sh**t" - that stuff is batsh--t crazy.Thankfully Abrams won't be winning her election this year.
Definitely not "beyond QAnon sh**t" - that stuff is batsh--t crazy.Thankfully Abrams won't be winning her election this year.
Interesting lawsuit that one.1. Ships immigrants to 'lawyer island'
2. Immigrants get lawyered up
businessinsider.com/florida-officials-made-fake-brochures-for-migrants-lawsuit-ron-desantis-2022-9?international=true&r=US&IR=T
Florida officials made fake 'official-looking' brochure advertising refugee benefits for migrants, lawsuit against Ron DeSantis says
![]()
If I came to you and handed you a bunch of brochures promising you a job in another part of the country then shipped you out on false pretences, then it turned out that I was just doing it for a grotesque political stunt and there were no jobs and nobody even prepared to take them in so those people had to suddenly scramble to find accommodation and care for you, I think you'd have a pretty good case against me.
Why is De Santos being racist? Martha's Vineyard is good enough for Barack Obama. Why isn't it good enough for an illegal immigrant.The locals stepped up as best they could, till they could be moved to an emergency shelter at Cape Cod.
![]()
Migrants land on Martha's Vineyard - The Martha's Vineyard Times
Updated September 15 A group 50 Venezuelan migrants, some of them children, landed on Martha’s Vineyard on Wednesday. The migrants arrived by plane at Martha’s Vineyard Airport. According to Geoff Freeman, airport director at Martha’s Vineyard Airport, the name of the charter was Ultimate Air...www.mvtimes.com
Sorry, I know DeSantis wanted to prove that everyone is as much of a racist pig as he is, but he failed and now he's being sued.
Border towns are not equipped to deal with immigrants either. So why are border towns expected to deal with them?Martha's Vineyard is not equipped to provide sustainable accommodation and services. Are you expecting them to establish one when there are existing facilities available elsewhere? The national guard was utilised as they have the resources, equipment and are best placed to assist.
No, it really is.Definitely not "beyond QAnon sh**t" - that stuff is batsh--t crazy.
Pretty sure they have federal agencies, centers and facilities in place which are funded by the federal govt.Border towns are not equipped to deal with immigrants either. So why are border towns expected to deal with them?
I know it’s real - it’s the issue with factsNo, it really is.
All of them are overflowing in border towns. Which means the government just releases them onto the streets and lets the residents deal with them.Pretty sure they have federal agencies, centers and facilities in place which are funded by the federal govt.
And there are no plans underway to address this using cities with infrastructure and shelter to support them?All of them are overflowing in border towns. Which means the government just releases them onto the streets and lets the residents deal with them.
It isn't just a neighbouring state. It is a state that explicitly voted for the president responsible for letting in the migrants in the first place.And there are no plans underway to address this using cities with infrastructure and shelter to support them?
You think it's much more practical to round up some asylum-seekers fraudulently promising cash, jobs, housing and other incentives in a neighbouring state and abandon them elsewhere with no plans, advanced warning or ethical/legal consideration at an exorbitant cost to the taxpayers of a state with no mass-migration issues?
In 2017, Massachusetts' top state court ruled that Massachusetts court officers do not have the authority to arrest someone suspected of being in the U.S. illegally if that person is not facing criminal charges, the state's highest court ruled Monday. That's effectively gave the state sanctuary status.
But for years, advocates have tried to get a bill that would codify sanctuary status in Massachusetts, and it hasn't passed, despite Democrats, who tend to support sanctuary status more than Republicans, controlling the Legislature.
It seems you're missing the point - Let's talk facts.It isn't just a neighbouring state. It is a state that explicitly voted for the president responsible for letting in the migrants in the first place.
The only reason why Democrat states love illegal immigrants is because they don't have to deal with them. All this policy does is make the people who vote for lax borders feel the consequences of lax borders.
A Democrat judge in a Democrat state made it illegal for a state police officer to enforce federal immigration law:
1) Asylum-seekers aren't illegal immigrants.Why is it unethical thing to send illegal immigrants to a place that gives them huge legal protection from being deported?
1) I think it's been covered above but enticing someone with bullsh--t which isn't a reality is fraud. If I promise you a job, housing and free cash for 8 months and you come here and it's all bullshit that's illegal - migrant or otherwise.Ands if they are in the country legally as asylum seekers, what is illegal about giving them a free ticket to a place fit for presidents? Why aren't there jobs for asylum seekers in Martha's Vineyard? I thought Democrat states were meant to be pro poor with pro-poor policies?
In a statement provided to Rolling Stone, Cruz press secretary Dave Vasquez argued that the bill Cruz voted against — and which, again, funded the project he’s claiming credit for — was a “Democrat spending spree that contributed to an economic recession for American families,” and that “Ports-to-Plains could have easily and unanimously passed the Senate as a separate bill, but it was rolled into the pork-filled omnibus package Democrats rammed through Congress.”
Lets hope he gets a jail sentence similar to James Alex Fields, but I'm guessing not anywhere close
From the side of "tolerance".
The thread is pretty funny too.