vaccination side effects

Dave

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 31, 2008
Messages
76,526
The biggest problem with vaers is it is under reported. If it was accurate the numbers would be even more terrifying.

Nope







 

Suspect99

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2012
Messages
6,613
It certainly seems to lean towards positive results.

So much so that I asked on this forum whether anyone had been found COVID negative and surprisingly (to me) some people had.

Only one person I know personally has tested negative and she had prepped beforehand by gargling with salt several times in the hours leading up to her test.
During the worst of the waves the positivity rate hits about 30%. That means that only 30% of tests are positive worst case. It drops below 10 percent sometimes.
 

pinball wizard

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
34,362
Nope







Yes. Cause you can measure people who experience something and say nothing about it.

Pull the other one.

I, the Chinese, several others I know, had issues after the vaccine that one would report, but, meh, I didn't dieded, so we didn't.

Sure. It's insignificant. Keep telling yourself that.
 

pinball wizard

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
34,362
During the worst of the waves the positivity rate hits about 30%. That means that only 30% of tests are positive worst case. It drops below 10 percent sometimes.
That said nothing towards the number of false positives. It only has relevance to the increased number of tests being done.
 

Dave

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 31, 2008
Messages
76,526
Yes. Cause you can measure people who experience something and say nothing about it.

You do realise anyone can make a VAERS report? Even if they have never had the vaccine and could even be an antivaxxer or flat earther.
 

pinball wizard

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
34,362
You do realise anyone can make a VAERS report? Even if they have never had the vaccine and could even be an antivaxxer or flat earther.
So, you're basing your claim on imaginary things? The same as you accuse me of doing?

Why does your claim carry more weight?

I have personal, if anecdotal, evidence to back my claim at least.
 

Suspect99

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2012
Messages
6,613
That said nothing towards the number of false positives. It only has relevance to the increased number of tests being done.
Maumau says they thought the tests skewed towards positive results. And they hardly heard of anyone with a negative.

Worst case 70% of the results are negative. Most of the time it's 90%
I never said anything about false positives
 

pinball wizard

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
34,362
Maumau says they thought the tests skewed towards positive results. And they hardly heard of anyone with a negative.

Worst case 70% of the results are negative. Most of the time it's 90%
I never said anything about false positives
Fair enough.

However the massive false positive rate impacts this.
 

lexity

Executive Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2020
Messages
7,093
I changed my reaction to sad.

It's no laughing matter. Either way you look at it.

The really crazy thing is, if people were offered a safe haven, one from the other, say a municipality with the basics to survive until they are comfortable returning. One or two for a) those who fear the effects of the jabbed, and b) for those who fear the effects of the unjabbed(shedding), we would have nothing but happy, or at no serious contention in society.

The only trouble with this is that it doesn't get the politicians and their cronies a get-out-out-of-jail-free card. Because either way, it will become clear in time who is right. This is what the government and its cronies fear.

This is the real reason governments(and cronies) can't stand open competition.... because it spells the end of their crime-sprees. They would have to change their ways by respecting self-ownership of individuals.

As any Marxist will tell you, individuals are not capable of learning from their mistakes, they have no power of choice. Self-control is a matter of suppression, rather than expression. That they are merely at the mercy of their environment and their genes, and of statistics.
 
Last edited:

PsyWulf

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
16,578
It certainly seems to lean towards positive results.

So much so that I asked on this forum whether anyone had been found COVID negative and surprisingly (to me) some people had.

Only one person I know personally has tested negative and she had prepped beforehand by gargling with salt several times in the hours leading up to her test.
17 tests sofar,0 positives (I travel a lot for work)
I don't even flinch anymore when they dig in

Think majority of the "false" positives are people who did have it,asymptomatically,and got over it but still have DNA traces

ART tests for current infection in comparison
 

lexity

Executive Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2020
Messages
7,093
17 tests sofar,0 positives (I travel a lot for work)
I don't even flinch anymore when they dig in

Think majority of the "false" positives are people who did have it,asymptomatically,and got over it but still have DNA traces

ART tests for current infection in comparison
Wrt the PCR test.... and being 'dug' into....

What do you make of what Kerry Mullis said about his PCR tech'? He was the inventor it, right?
 

SoldierMan

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2019
Messages
9,416
You are such a laughable conspiracy nut :) And I asked you first - did you do drama by any chance?

But I do have a post-graduate degree, if that helps you. It helps me go, umm, where do you get the "hundreds of millions body count" from? Your ass, as usual?

And - "yes"

Such a pleasant fellow you are :)
 

SoldierMan

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2019
Messages
9,416
Oh, mine is supported by observational evidence and the fact that he couldn't respond. But nice try (and thanks for imitating me) :)

Of course it is sonny, of course it is, when you do it, it's all above board, when anyone else does it, it's malevolent. And the sun shines out your ass too, you self-righteous ninny :ROFL:
I was mocking, not imitating you :)
 

Dave

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 31, 2008
Messages
76,526
So, you're basing your claim on imaginary things? The same as you accuse me of doing?

You make no sense, I'm saying VAERS is not set up for the purposes anti-vaxxers are using it for and it can be manipulated by these naughty little people.

I posted a number of sources that back it up.
 

Dave

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 31, 2008
Messages
76,526
Of course it is sonny, of course it is, when you do it, it's all above board, when anyone else does it, it's malevolent. And the sun shines out your ass too, you self-righteous ninny :ROFL:
I was mocking, not imitating you :)

What a lovely compassionate Christian you are...
 

pinball wizard

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
34,362
You make no sense, I'm saying VAERS is not set up for the purposes anti-vaxxers are using it for and it can be manipulated by these naughty little people.

I posted a number of sources that back it up.
Wait.

You're saying fake reports are there, and I'm saying not everyone who experiences something reports it, and I'm not making sense?

Would you prefer smoke signals?

In essence we agree that the vaers system is not accurate, right?
 

SoldierMan

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2019
Messages
9,416
What a lovely compassionate Christian you are...

Yes I like to think so, but I have my off days as well.

Here's the thing though, this forum is full of crude, aggressive, insulting egotists like yourself and so every now and then you gotta get a little dirty. After all this is a debate forum is it not?
 
Top