vaccination side effects

Solarion

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 14, 2012
Messages
21,885
2 years ago I bought this decent PC screen. In the sales agreement I read it said that should something go wrong with this screen within two years I can bring it back to be exchanged for another one. This is accountability and the store I purchased it from has taken responsibility for if anything goes wrong with it. This tells me that the store is confident enough in their product that it will perform as expected.

If you go to your doctor and ask him to advise you on whether or not you should take this vaccine, he will not tell you what to do, he will help you to make a decision. If you ask him to give it to you in writing that you should go ahead and take it, he will not.

If you boss demands you take it or get fired. If you ask him to give it to you in writing that he bears full responsibility if something goes wrong, he will not.

Governments worldwide already have indemnifications in place which protect them from any and all complications, illness or death from this vaccine. The same is said for medical institutions such as Pfizer and J&J who are untouchable due to their mile high indemnification clauses.

So that leaves all the costs, repercussions and responsibility onto one person and one person alone: the person taking the vaccine. If anything goes wrong, it's all on YOU. Now what impression does that give when nobody else on Earth trusts this product enough to be held accountable if something goes wrong? It lends itself to a lack of confidence in the product is what it does.
 

lexity

Executive Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2020
Messages
7,093
2 years ago I bought this decent PC screen. In the sales agreement I read it said that should something go wrong with this screen within two years I can bring it back to be exchanged for another one. This is accountability and the store I purchased it from has taken responsibility for if anything goes wrong with it. This tells me that the store is confident enough in their product that it will perform as expected.

If you go to your doctor and ask him to advise you on whether or not you should take this vaccine, he will not tell you what to do, he will help you to make a decision. If you ask him to give it to you in writing that you should go ahead and take it, he will not.

If you boss demands you take it or get fired. If you ask him to give it to you in writing that he bears full responsibility if something goes wrong, he will not.

Governments worldwide already have indemnifications in place which protect them from any and all complications, illness or death from this vaccine. The same is said for medical institutions such as Pfizer and J&J who are untouchable due to their mile high indemnification clauses.

So that leaves all the costs, repercussions and responsibility onto one person and one person alone: the person taking the vaccine. If anything goes wrong, it's all on YOU. Now what impression does that give when nobody else on Earth trusts this product enough to be held accountable if something goes wrong? It lends itself to a lack of confidence in the product is what it does.
A certain percentage of the population will not take personal responsibility for becoming and remaining well-informed. This is a human frailty, which has everything to do with succumbing to fear. Which is why the politically-protected class has specialized in moving the masses from one imminent doom scenario to the next. For decades and decades this has been the pattern, ramping up to the current global threat.

This fear-mongered group, with the relatively-lower fear threshold, can be relied upon to back The Science TM, no questions asked. Superficial cues and markers are what they rely on in determining which source to trust. It's as though the blinkers come on, and a rote alignment with well-dressed, well- and quietly-spoken yet rights-violating Political/Crony-class is par for the course. The content and track-record of that source, and the incentives at play when it comes to manufacturers i.e. effectively-protected from would-be competition, typically do not factor in to their determination.

Those of us above that fear threshold, are now in a huge pickle. The fear-mongered have become the arm of the State(politician/bureaucrat/crony class). They will carry out the most horrendous human rights violations without turning a hair, whilst in that state of terror.

When the penny starts to drop, for the rest of us, you start seeing scenes like this

iu
 
Last edited:

John Tempus

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2017
Messages
6,121
Not made up. Absolutely accurate and documented by the manufacturers. The fact that YOU don't know it is the only issue.

1. The vaccines are NOT perfect.
2. The vaccines are not 100% guaranteed to work in all people equally well or badly, depending on your point of view.
3. Vaccines (and their ingredients) DO trigger adverse reactions in some individuals. (You should be grateful, that you are not one of those individuals).
5. The fact that the manufacturers do not always know why adverse reactions occur, or, can't always predict how severe the adverse reactions are going to be, does NOT mean the vaccines are automatically bad either. It just means that the reactions need to be acknowledged and dealt with if and when they occur. Hence the existence of monitoring systems such as VAERS etc.
6. Why do you think the rule exists about waiting for x minutes after getting a shot exists?
4. Your failure to acknowledge that exceptions prove the rule is YOUR problem, not mine.
5. It is your problem that you don't know or refuse to accept information when presented, not mine.

I think the most important issue that doesn't get enough coverage during this vaccine hysteria.

Vaccine producers are immune against prosecution for any side effects caused by the vaccine.

If you need immunity for a product you are peddling and in some part forcing onto people then wake the fk up and smell the roses. There is clearly something wrong enough that these vaccine producers need this immunity coverage.

This is even more evil than the tobacco industry. If you die from cancer caused by smoking you cannot go and sue the tobacco industry but at the same time the tobacco industry is not forcing you to smoke or creating an environment where you feel like you better start smoking or else you wont fit in.

Oh and btw, I have 2 friends in Sweden who just got their third shot and they are sick as hell. The first 2 shots they were only having side effects for 2-3 days but after the third shot all hell broke loose. One is in hospital already and the other is still at home but at this rate will be heading to the hospital.

These are young guys under 30, super healthy and barely ever had any illnesses up to this bs.
 

Charlesjjm

Expert Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2014
Messages
1,186
Not made up. Absolutely accurate and documented by the manufacturers. The fact that YOU don't know it is the only issue.

1. The vaccines are NOT perfect.
2. The vaccines are not 100% guaranteed to work in all people equally well or badly, depending on your point of view.
3. Vaccines (and their ingredients) DO trigger adverse reactions in some individuals. (You should be grateful, that you are not one of those individuals).
5. The fact that the manufacturers do not always know why adverse reactions occur, or, can't always predict how severe the adverse reactions are going to be, does NOT mean the vaccines are automatically bad either. It just means that the reactions need to be acknowledged and dealt with if and when they occur. Hence the existence of monitoring systems such as VAERS etc.
6. Why do you think the rule exists about waiting for x minutes after getting a shot exists?
4. Your failure to acknowledge that exceptions prove the rule is YOUR problem, not mine.
5. It is your problem that you don't know or refuse to accept information when presented, not mine.
1644228938434.png
Your numbering is all over the place. It should be 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 and not whatever the hell you were doing.
 

Dave

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 31, 2008
Messages
76,500
Oh and btw, I have 2 friends in Sweden who just got their third shot and they are sick as hell. The first 2 shots they were only having side effects for 2-3 days but after the third shot all hell broke loose. One is in hospital already and the other is still at home but at this rate will be heading to the hospital.

Oh and btw, I have 2 friends in Sealand who just got their third shot and they now have superpowers. The first 2 shots they were only having side effects for 2-3 days but after the third shot all hell broke loose. One is able to leap tall buildings in one bound already and the other is still at home but can now fly but at this rate will be heading to the moon on his first flight.
 

PsyWulf

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
16,574
Oh and btw, I have 2 friends in Sealand who just got their third shot and they now have superpowers. The first 2 shots they were only having side effects for 2-3 days but after the third shot all hell broke loose. One is able to leap tall buildings in one bound already and the other is still at home but can now fly but at this rate will be heading to the moon on his first flight.
Imagine what kind of superhuman beast this woman must be now
The error happened because the nurse thought that the vial she was injecting had already undergone a necessary dilution step — before the vaccine can be administered, each of the six doses is taken out of the original vial and put into a new vial, where the dose is diluted, CBS News reported.

"She thought that the dilution had taken place," Dr. Tommaso Bellandi, director of patient security for the northwest Tuscany health authority, told CBS News. "They are both transparent liquids of the same density. Unfortunately, this contributed to the error."

The nurse quickly realized her mistake, and the patient was monitored for 24 hours at the hospital. She was given fluids and fever-reducing medications as a preventive measure, according to CBS News.

The only side effect the woman experienced was pain at the injection site, and she was released from the hospital Monday (May 10), officials said.
 

lexity

Executive Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2020
Messages
7,093
I think the most important issue that doesn't get enough coverage during this vaccine hysteria.

Vaccine producers are immune against prosecution for any side effects caused by the vaccine.
See this post, on forfeiting of immunity:
Nonetheless, I 100% agree they wanted :

a) the tax-payer to buy their experimental drugs, in bulk, to the tune of multi-billion USD, and

b) they wanted legal immunity for anything going wrong,

c) for the State to use a PCR test - something for which RT PCR was not designed for and cannot achieve - to pump out vast numbers of implied cases of disease that was about to spread and kill millions of people. Straight-up terrorism. This thread is full of the effects of this propaganda and fear-mongering.
 

Dave

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 31, 2008
Messages
76,500

Interesting fellow, Dr Yeadon.

Michael Yeadon is a British anti-vaccine activist[1][2] and retired pharmacologist who attracted media attention for making false or unfounded claims about the COVID-19 pandemic and the safety of COVID-19 vaccines.[3][1]The Times has described him as "a hero of Covid conspiracy theorists"[4] and "a key figure in the antivax movement".[5]
 

tetrasect

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
9,097
to pump out vast numbers of implied cases of disease that was about to spread and kill millions of people. Straight-up terrorism. This thread is full of the effects of this propaganda and fear-mongering.

It literally has killed millions of people you absolute clown.
 

tetrasect

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
9,097
What has?

I think this might apply to you:

 
Top