ShaunSA
Derailment Squad
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2005
- Messages
- 49,775
Yes for both. Now refute my statement. Those medical people support my statement, not yours.
Yeah masks did ****all mate
And no that's not hindsight
Yes for both. Now refute my statement. Those medical people support my statement, not yours.
This has been studied and recommended even before Covid :Yeah masks did ****all mate
And no that's not hindsight
Actually it doesn't matter. Cannot copy from Google drive, but check out the result of quasi study of masking in hospital setting.
5979masks.pdf
drive.google.com
Yeah masks did ****all mate
And no that's not hindsight
Yes, it means that the masks were so useless that they did not even work in the controlled hospital setting.Did you read the press release you posted? It refers to the less infectious Omicron variant only. And do you understand what nosocomial means?
What lie???? What public???That gives your lie to your claim that the study was on the public.
Bwahaha!As the influenza pandemic swept across the United States in 1918 and 1919, masks took a role in political and cultural wars.![]()
The Mask Slackers of 1918 (Published 2020)
As the influenza pandemic swept across the United States in 1918 and 1919, masks took a role in political and cultural wars.www.nytimes.com
Sounds familiar
![]()
![]()
More familiar
Lol
Yes, it means that the masks were so useless that they did not even work in the controlled hospital setting.