vaccination side effects

[lmao]

It's quite clear that:

a. That site is an anti-vax crank site; and
b. It's presentation is fudged.

But it fits in with your world view, so enjoy.

Dude, your ability to read sentences coherently is now very much in question.

 

[calvin-]

Dude, your ability to read sentences coherently is now very much in question.

Right. So it's not an anti-vax site.

And it doesn't make the weirdest interpretations of data.

Because that fits in with your world view.

 

[lmao]

Right. So it's not an anti-vax site.

And it doesn't make the weirdest interpretations of data.

Because that fits in with your world view.

No, I mean, you said you were misinformed, and I asked by whom. This is how your ability for basic comprehension is in question. If you don't pass this basic cognitive test, there is truly no point in bothering with anything else.

So again, misinformed by whom, and to what end?

 

[Tokolotshe]

I find that searching for myself to back up other people's statements is a very unreliable thing.

If I dispute your conclusions based on a source that Google finds for me, i will be met by the inevitable "not that source"..

So instead I suggest, if you make a claim, you provide your source to back it up.

People who tell me to use Google to back up their statements, sorry no.

They not only tried going after him, but tried twice! And failed twice.

Professor Noakes Found Innocent (Again)!​

Professor Noakes Found Innocent (Again)! — The Nutrition Coalition

Today, Professor Tim Noakes was found innocent of all charges in proceedings against him by South African medical authorities. This is his second acquittal; the first came in April 2017, which was then appealed.

www.nutritioncoalition.us

 

[lexity]

No it's not. It's some anti-vax cranks' weird interpretation thereof.

If it's a weird interpretation, what's the original look like?

You sound like you've looked.

 

[quovadis]

They not only tried going after him, but tried twice! And failed twice.

Not really - the charge was misconduct for offering diet advice on social media for advising a mother to wean a baby onto a LCHF diet. The finding is his advice was not and could not be interpreted as medical advice but simply an author and proponent of a diet.

Think about that for a moment. If his social media utterances cannot be interpreted as medical opinion then why are people posting his covid views and social media posts as something that should be held to a high standard or any form of medical or scientific opinion?

To characterise it as it was of "science is always on our side" isn't quite what the ruling declared nor should this be interpreted as trying to silence anyone.

 

[kolaval]

Wow had a conversation about post lock down covid yesterday, every abnormal death is now the vaccine.

 

[lmao]

Not really - the charge was misconduct for offering diet advice on social media for advising a mother to wean a baby onto a LCHF diet. The finding is his advice was not and could not be interpreted as medical advice but simply an author and proponent of a diet.

So in other words, they tried to discipline him because he refused to toe the high carb line. Thanks for pointing that out.

Think about that for a moment. If his social media utterances cannot be interpreted as medical opinion then why are people posting his covid views and social media posts as something that should be held to a high standard or any form of medical or scientific opinion?

Why would anyone waste their time with irrelevant nonsense that has nothing to do with anything?

To characterise it as it was of "science is always on our side" isn't quite what the ruling declared nor should this be interpreted as trying to silence anyone.

That wasn't the characterisation? The characterisation was that Noakes is correct in his views, and the people who are wrong attempted to remove his ability to tell them they're wrong rather than admit their mistake, which obviously has a chilling effect on anyone else who might want to speak out, which is exactly what the real intent of the people who were persecuting Noakes was.

But you want us all to have faith in this community of people who would rather lie than give up their reputation.

 

[lmao]

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/08/190829150642.htm

I'm sure no scientist ever thought to protect their career and reputation despite whatever the facts may say. They're definitely a superior breed who would not exhibit all of the emotional idiosyncrasies we see on this forum on a daily basis.

 

[lexity]

Establishment threaten to fine or lock people up for misinforming others.

6 months in jail if you spread fake news about coronavirus​

Yet we are simultaneously supposed to believe the scientific consensus is meritorious.

There's the FAAB I mentioned (fear as a bug).

​

When someone has a gun pointed to your head, I cannot take what you say in their defense seriously.

 

[lmao]

Establishment threaten to fine or lock people up for misinforming others.



Yet we are simultaneously supposed to believe the scientific consensus is meritorious.

There's the FAAB I mentioned.

​

Lol, dude, I got flat out asked to give an example of someone whose voice wasn't heard because I mentioned censorship.

Just think about that for a second!

 

[lexity]

Lol, dude, I got flat out asked to give an example of someone whose voice wasn't heard because I mentioned censorship.

Just think about that for a second!

Yep.

The person giving a verbal defense of his tormentor/terrorizer/aggressor, cannot expect others to take that defense at face value.

#StockholmSyndrome

 

[Tonsilolith]

Wow had a conversation about post lock down covid yesterday, every abnormal death is now the vaccine.

There are people that take this type of person seriously

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682965287732383744

 

[Tonsilolith]

Lol
Do you get that both other infections and viral diseases fall under "haematological" in your graph.

You also understand that UK has disability payments for long COVID.

You also understand there are a few hurdles you have to pass through before being granted this grant.

 

[Tonsilolith]

The excuse? "The research methodology was found to be wanting". The real reason was that the outcomes were pretty damning against mRNA Covide vaccines.

I take it you're done with that study, do you still believe there are no issues with the methodology?

 

[PsyWulf]

Wow had a conversation about post lock down covid yesterday, every abnormal death is now the vaccine.

A circle of nuts is still a circle of nuts

 

[calvin-]

If it's a weird interpretation, what's the original look like?

You sound like you've looked.

Everything on that site is some weird interpretation of source data to fit the anti-vaxx world view.

It's a very "reliable" site to "confirm" anti-vaxx talking points.

 

[lexity]

Everything on that site is some weird interpretation of source data to fit the anti-vaxx world view.

It's a very "reliable" site to "confirm" anti-vaxx talking points.

What are you using as a determining factor for 'weird'?

 

[Geoff.D]

Moderna - Defending The Republic

defendingtherepublic.org

Holy ****.

And this part is the real tragedy and indictment against the authorities, the manufacturers and many doctors during this circus:

Many of those who died after receiving the Moderna vaccine were not given an autopsy. According to one study, 16 individuals died after being administered the Moderna vaccine. The study’s authors indicated that out of those 16 deaths, only two autopsies were performed, five of the dead were not autopsied, and the autopsy status of nine of the dead was “unknown”.

No one was really interested in what it was about the virus that was killing people. And definitely, they had no intention then and still don't, to find out what it is about the vaccines that is killing people.

I raised this issue many many months ago, and not a single one of the medical people on myBB even bothered to comment. No one in SA is in the least bit interested in developing a thorough understanding of this virus or the so-called vaccines.

 

[Geoff.D]

I take it you're done with that study, do you still believe there are no issues with the methodology?

No not done with it yet.