vaccination side effects

Daveogg

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2003
Messages
2,311
Actually no, I use the Age-specific rate per 100 000 from Tables 3 and 4 for all these graphs including the one you refer to as OP.

Fair enough, I see flytek alluded to this earlier:


I agree that smaller age-groups are needed. What we are seeing is that in the 60-69 and 70-79 the all cause mortality rate is lower in vaccinated vs unvaccinated groups. Good news for sure.

Of course if we stratify the ages in 10 year increments from 10-59 then it cannot be true that ALL of them will also have an all-cause mortality rate that is lower in vaccinated vs unvaccinated groups.

This implies that there should be at least one ten-year increment (between 10-59) that has an all-cause mortality rate that is greater in vaccinated vs unvaccinated groups to explain the higher rate we see in the 10-59 group.

I hope they include these age stratifications in the next dataset.
"I hope they include these age stratifications in the next dataset."

They wont, if you are interested here is the methodology.


"This implies that there should be at least one ten-year increment (between 10-59) that has an all-cause mortality rate that is greater in vaccinated vs unvaccinated groups to explain the higher rate we see in the 10-59 group.

Nope I don't think so.
 

Daveogg

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2003
Messages
2,311
Or people who are already frail/sick, especially the older ones don't get the vaccine to reduce futher stress on their body vs mostly healthy people who can get the vaccines?
Lol you quote me, then edit out the part of my post directly alluding to this in the data set, to stimulate debate.
 

Seven_Nine_Eight

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2020
Messages
285
So can we conclude the answer to your original question is no?
The observation is that the all-cause mortality is higher in vaccinated people compared to unvaccinated people for ages between 10-59. And that is all we can say at the moment.
 

Seven_Nine_Eight

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2020
Messages
285
"I hope they include these age stratifications in the next dataset."

They wont, if you are interested here is the methodology.

Sadly yes, they probably won't.

"This implies that there should be at least one ten-year increment (between 10-59) that has an all-cause mortality rate that is greater in vaccinated vs unvaccinated groups to explain the higher rate we see in the 10-59 group.

Nope I don't think so.
I'd love to see a dataset whereby:
1) The all cause mortality rate for ages between 10-59 is HIGHER in vaccinated vs unvaccinated.
2) The all cause mortality rate for ALL the 10-year increments between 10-59 is LOWER in vaccinated vs unvaccinated.
 

Daveogg

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2003
Messages
2,311
The observation is that the all-cause mortality is higher in vaccinated people compared to unvaccinated people for ages between 10-59. And that is all we can say at the moment.
We can say that but we need to add, without adjusting for age and sex, discussing mortality rates in an age bracket 10-59 is pointless, unless you simple want to further an agenda by duping people who don't have the cognitive ability to understand the statistics.
 

Aasvoël

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2008
Messages
738
Lol you quote me, then edit out the part of my post directly alluding to this in the data set, to stimulate debate.
I re-read and re-read your post? Where do you allude to this? I'm picking up stompies here so maybe in a previous post?
 

Seven_Nine_Eight

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2020
Messages
285
We can say that but we need to add, without adjusting for age and sex, discussing mortality rates in an age bracket 10-59 is pointless, unless you simple want to further an agenda by duping people who don't have the cognitive ability to understand the statistics.
I wouldn't say it is pointless. It is simple to understand that in the 10-59 age bracket there is some subgroup (be it a certain age or sex or whatever) where all-cause mortality is higher in vaccinated people compared to unvaccinated people and we need to understand why this is the case.
 

Daveogg

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2003
Messages
2,311
I wouldn't say it is pointless. It is simple to understand that in the 10-59 age bracket there is some subgroup (be it a certain age or sex or whatever) where all-cause mortality is higher in vaccinated people compared to unvaccinated people and we need to understand why this is the case.
Its not simple to understand, its simple to be wrong.

Mortality VacPop VaccDeaths VacMortality UnVacPop UnVacDeaths UnVac
10-190.90%10009.001.00%1000001000
20-291.80%25000450.002.00%750001500
30-392.70%500001,350.003.00%500001500
40-493.60%750002,700.004.00%250001000
50-594.50%1000004,500.005.00%100050
9,009.005050
 

Hush9300

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2011
Messages
2,261
We can say that but we need to add, without adjusting for age and sex, discussing mortality rates in an age bracket 10-59 is pointless, unless you simple want to further an agenda by duping people who don't have the cognitive ability to understand the statistics.
There is a rather simple way to remove this bias. Just compare all cause mortality for all ages 2020 vs 2021...
 

Seven_Nine_Eight

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2020
Messages
285
Its not simple to understand, its simple to be wrong.

Mortality VacPop VaccDeaths VacMortality UnVacPop UnVacDeaths UnVac
10-190.90%10009.001.00%1000001000
20-291.80%25000450.002.00%750001500
30-392.70%500001,350.003.00%500001500
40-493.60%750002,700.004.00%250001000
50-594.50%1000004,500.005.00%100050
9,009.005050
Fair enough, I see what you mean now. It is likely that there is no subgroup with increased all-cause mortality in vaccinated people compared to unvaccinated people in the 10-59 group.
 

Daveogg

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2003
Messages
2,311
I re-read and re-read your post? Where do you allude to this? I'm picking up stompies here so maybe in a previous post?
When you quoted me you deleted this bit?

"EDIT:

See the group with the lowest mortality is those who received the second dose of vaccine less than 21 days ago at 464.6.
I could use this fact to prove vaccine are safe as the people who just received it DONT die. But I wont because that would be lying with statistics. Anyone care to explain why?"
 

Hush9300

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2011
Messages
2,261
So the only difference between 2020 and 2021 is vaccination?
I fear you are entering a rabbit hole of confounding variables of which their may be no return.
There are always going to be confounders but if we're to assume that these vaccines save lives then at bare minimum mortality year on year (2020 vs 2021) should be reduced. Would that not be a reasonable expectation?

I'm sure you've heard the news... Deaths galore, bodies in bags, bodies in vans, hospitals bursting at the seam all due to Covid.
 

Daveogg

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2003
Messages
2,311
There are always going to be confounders but if we're to assume that these vaccines save lives then at bare minimum mortality year on year (2020 vs 2021) should be reduced. Would that not be a reasonable expectation?

I'm sure you've heard the news... Deaths galore, bodies in bags, bodies in vans, hospitals bursting at the seam all due to Covid.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecAve
567044365049723881415236342614407783718442494462825131756672Total(2020 + JAn,Feb, Mar 2021)78862852575.2
73315587674862441513378644122343264431514752046511Rest 202130104643006
 

Hush9300

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2011
Messages
2,261
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecAve
567044365049723881415236342614407783718442494462825131756672Total(2020 + JAn,Feb, Mar 2021)78862852575.2
73315587674862441513378644122343264431514752046511Rest 202130104643006
No. Just no... You talk about manipulating statistics to further an agenda yet you blatantly do the same.

Jan - October 2020 = 499,933
Jan - October 2021 = 524,975

The UK started vaccinations in the second week of December 2020. The vaccine has made no dent whatsoever on all cause mortality. None.

Covid was apparently 2020's great killer, yet the introduction of a highly effective vaccine has done nothing to arrest this trend.

There are much simpler explanations than all this mental gymnastics:

1. Covid was and continues to pick off the vulnerable, even post vaccination or;
2. Covid wasn't that deadly to begin with or;
3. If vaccine is so effective, all cause parity is a result of vaccine injury

My money is on 1 and 2.
 

Geoff.D

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 4, 2005
Messages
26,878
There are much simpler explanations than all this mental gymnastics:

1. Covid was and continues to pick off the vulnerable, even post vaccination or;
2. Covid wasn't that deadly to begin with or;
3. If vaccine is so effective, all cause parity is a result of vaccine injury
I would not write off 3 so easily, as, all over the place, there is evidence emerging that deaths due to vaccine injury are just not been logged correctly.
 

JohnStarr

Executive Member
Joined
May 21, 2018
Messages
9,342
I would not write off 3 so easily, as, all over the place, there is evidence emerging that deaths due to vaccine injury are just not been logged correctly.
Since it's all over the place, could you please provide evidence? To back up the claim.
 
Top