• You are not registered on MyBroadband, which means you miss out on great benefits. To join our community is very easy, and completely free. Register now.
  • Win an Amazon Echo Dot in this two-day giveaway - Enter Here

VBS Mutual Bank being victimised - EFF

TysonRoux

Expert Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2012
Messages
2,690
You're ripe for being deceived and misled. If I may ask one more question, do you think Hitler is the most evil man in the 20th century, or better yet world history? If not, who is the most evil man in world history in your opinion?
What's your opinion of Hitler?

muslimhate70.jpg
 

TysonRoux

Expert Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2012
Messages
2,690
VBS only survived as long as it did because of the support ("investments"), it got from ANC comrade run municipalities .
 

Sly21C

Expert Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2008
Messages
4,632
I have other things to do than thinking of who's the most evil. I don't think in trivial terms such as "boo he's bad" "yayyy he's good", that's the reasoning of a poorly educated person - or of a kid.

I live very well and don't get disappointed much, trust me.

Still waiting for that proof of the hidden treasure of the Vendas?
I'm aware of Thohoyandou Unit D, I drove past there once on dirt/gravel roads, and impressive houses. It's a village, but with houses similar to Sandton.

https://goo.gl/maps/pPCKU1Ps3GC2

I'm sure you can find more if you Google "Thohoyandou-D" or "Thohoyandou Unit D" ....

Hopefully you are aware of Thavhani Mall? Look through this gallery http://thavhanimall.co.za/gallery/

6 of my colleagues are originally from Venda, all professionals (degrees and all, except for 1). So they tell me stories you won't find on mainstream media.
 

Sly21C

Expert Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2008
Messages
4,632
He defied international bankers, and he was punished for it.

Consumers and lovers of western media believe Gaddafi was killed because he was a dictator. He was killed because he wanted to sell oil for gold. Don't mess with international bankers.

Hitler was a racist and nationalist yes, but his mistake was to create a successful German currency and economic system that bankers wouldn't benefit from.

Strange website alert!!!

http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/bankrupt-germany.php

Or so it seemed. Hitler and the National Socialists, who came to power in 1933, thwarted the international banking cartel by issuing their own money. In this they took their cue from Abraham Lincoln, who funded the American Civil War with government-issued paper money called "Greenbacks." Hitler began his national credit program by devising a plan of public works. Projects earmarked for funding included flood control, repair of public buildings and private residences, and construction of new buildings, roads, bridges, canals, and port facilities. The projected cost of the various programs was fixed at one billion units of the national currency. One billion non-inflationary bills of exchange, called Labor Treasury Certificates, were then issued against this cost. Millions of people were put to work on these projects, and the workers were paid with the Treasury Certificates. This government-issued money wasn't backed by gold, but it*wasbacked by something of real value. It was essentially a receipt for labor and materials delivered to the government. Hitler said, "for every mark that was issued we required the equivalent of a mark's worth of work done or goods produced." The workers then spent the Certificates on other goods and services, creating more jobs for more people.

Within two years, the unemployment problem had been solved and the country was back on its feet. It had a solid, stable currency, no debt, and no inflation, at a time when millions of people in the United States and other Western countries were still out of work and living on welfare. Germany even managed to restore foreign trade, although it was denied foreign credit and was faced with an economic boycott abroad. It did this by using a barter system: equipment and commodities were exchanged directly with other countries, circumventing the international banks. This system of direct exchange occurred without debt and without trade deficits. Germany's economic experiment, like Lincoln's, was short-lived; but it left some lasting monuments to its success, including the famous Autobahn, the world's first extensive superhighway.1

Hjalmar Schacht, who was then head of the German central bank, is quoted in a bit of wit that sums up the German version of the "Greenback" miracle. An American banker had commented, "Dr. Schacht, you should come to America. We've lots of money and that's real banking." Schacht replied, "You should come to Berlin. We don't have money. That's*real*banking."2

Although Hitler has rightfully gone down in infamy in the history books, he was quite popular with the German people, at least for a time. Stephen Zarlenga suggests in*The Lost Science of Money*that this was because he temporarily rescued Germany from English economic theory — the theory that money must be borrowed against the gold reserves of a private banking cartel rather than issued outright by the government.3*According to Canadian researcher Dr. Henry Makow, this may have been a chief reason Hitler had to be stopped: he had sidestepped the international bankers and created his own money. Makow quotes from the 1938 interrogation of C. G. Rakovsky, one of the founders of Soviet Bolsevism and a Trotsky intimate, who was tried in show trials in the USSR under Stalin. According to Rakovsky, Hitler had actually been funded by the international bankers, through their agent Hjalmar Schacht, in order to control Stalin, who had usurped power from their agent Trotsky. But Hitler had become an even bigger threat than Stalin when he had taken the bold step of printing his own money. Rakovsky said:

[Hitler] took over for himself the privilege of manufacturing money and not only physical moneys, but also financial ones; he took over the untouched machinery of falsification and put it to work for the benefit of the state . . . . Are you capable of imagining what would have come . . . if it had infected a number of other states . . . . If you can, then imagine its counterrevolutionary functions.4

Economist Henry C K Liu writes of Germany's remarkable transformation:

The Nazis came to power in Germany in 1933, at a time when its economy was in total collapse, with ruinous war-reparation obligations and zero prospects for foreign investment or credit. Yet through an independent monetary policy of sovereign credit and a full-employment public-works program, the Third Reich was able to turn a bankrupt Germany, stripped of overseas colonies it could exploit, into the strongest economy in Europe within four years, even before armament spending began.5

In*Billions for the Bankers, Debts for the People*(1984), Sheldon Emry commented:

Germany issued debt-free and interest-free money from 1935 and on, accounting for its startling rise from the depression to a world power in 5 years. Germany financed its entire government and war operation from 1935 to 1945 without gold and without debt, and it took the whole Capitalist and Communist world to destroy the German power over Europe and bring Europe back under the heel of the Bankers. Such history of money does not even appear in the textbooks of public (government) schools today...........
 

Sly21C

Expert Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2008
Messages
4,632
I don't know, but Hitler is not worse than King Leopold of Belgium for example. Just because one movie a year is made about the holocaust doesn't mean it's the most evil thing in history. No movie has been made, AFAIK, about King Leopold and his atrocities.
 

rietrot

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2016
Messages
8,782
He defied international bankers, and he was punished for it.

Consumers and lovers of western media believe Gaddafi was killed because he was a dictator. He was killed because he wanted to sell oil for gold. Don't mess with international bankers.

Hitler was a racist and nationalist yes, but his mistake was to create a successful German currency and economic system that bankers wouldn't benefit from.
Just a slight error. His mistake was being expansionist and taking things outside Germany. His mistake was invading Poland.
 

Sly21C

Expert Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2008
Messages
4,632
Just a slight error. His mistake was being expansionist and taking things outside Germany. His mistake was invading Poland.
The USA invades a country almost every decade, in the guise of WMD or Al Quada or world peace, yet no one declared war on the USA.
 

rietrot

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2016
Messages
8,782
The USA invades a country almost every decade, in the guise of WMD or Al Quada or world peace, yet no one declared war on the USA.
The US is far away from anyone. Completely different from Europe and they also don't shît on their own doorstep they invade countries on the other side of the planet and first convince their friends it's a good idea.
 

ToxicBunny

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
71,258
I don't know, but Hitler is not worse than King Leopold of Belgium for example. Just because one movie a year is made about the holocaust doesn't mean it's the most evil thing in history. No movie has been made, AFAIK, about King Leopold and his atrocities.
Wait.. so you say Hitler isn't the most evil, but refuse to offer up a different person? That unfortunately isn't acceptable... you need to offer up a credible alternative to MSM...

(Note, I have never once claimed Hitler was the most evil person of the 20th century in case you get a little bee in your bonnet)...
 
Top