SADVExpensive compared to? Last time I checked they were roughly in line with the other operators (except Cybersmart, but they only do high-density buildings).
Wish they will boost upload speed, or make all packages symmetrical, but apart from that I don't really know of anybody that provides a *lot* more bang for buck...
I also don't think they make a lot of money right of the bat -- payback period is most probably in excess of 6/7 years for them.
SADV
Vumatel does symmetric?Expensive compared to? Last time I checked they were roughly in line with the other operators (except Cybersmart, but they only do high-density buildings).
For a premium. The 10:1 ratios on their basic packages are a bit high.Vumatel does symmetric?
You know Vumatel didn't build most of it from the ground up? Actually I'm in opposite mind to this. Vumatel is already expensive and getting towards being the most expensive because they're struggling to raise capital, something Vodacom doesn't have a shortage of. I can only see it going down and perhaps dropping that ridiculous connection fee. Just maybe we'll also see prepaid fibre being offered as standard seeing how Vodacom has built a whole business on that culture.Competition Commission must block this. If they want to do fibre they must build it from the ground up or continue with what they've built so far.
Openserve?Expensive compared to? Last time I checked they were roughly in line with the other operators (except Cybersmart, but they only do high-density buildings).
Wish they will boost upload speed, or make all packages symmetrical, but apart from that I don't really know of anybody that provides a *lot* more bang for buck...
I also don't think they make a lot of money right of the bat -- payback period is most probably in excess of 6/7 years for them.