Vodacom throttling image quality on 3G?

[MrGray]

You made the statement, so you should provide the legal opinion to back it up surely.

If I agree with it, or not, image compression is used all over the world, including Europe.

But, in any case, you decided it's illegal and breaking three laws, so post the laws contravened or admit you've got no clue.

Your arguments above are pretty silly but let's see your legal backing for them. Especially Vodacom "making copies". Are you suggesting....actually just forget it, your attempt at being a forum-lawyer is mostly amusing.

But, of course, you might be correct, so please quote the relevant Acts as requested before.

I just said I don't *think* it's entirely legal, which is supported by the other comments. I'm sure that if Vodacom continues with this route, either customers will go elsewhere or someone is eventually going to go the legal route with this.

And there is a world of difference between image compression and quality reduction, or changing the nature of the thing you're compressing by injecting scripts.

I really don't think these objections are silly, or that one needs to quote the letter of the law to know that something is not broadly speaking above board. You are basically intercepting my communication, making a poor copy of it, or mangling it, and then presenting it to my clients as if it was my original work. If you are going to do this then please also inject a script that displays a large permanent alert on a red background across all web pages that you have similarly inflicted with the words "The quality of this page has been reduced by Vodacom".

 

[jannievanzyl]

I just said I don't *think* it's entirely legal, which is supported by the other comments. I'm sure that if Vodacom continues with this route, either customers will go elsewhere or someone is eventually going to go the legal route with this.

And there is a world of difference between image compression and quality reduction, or changing the nature of the thing you're compressing by injecting scripts.

I really don't think these objections are silly, or that one needs to quote the letter of the law to know that something is not broadly speaking above board. You are basically intercepting my communication, making a poor copy of it, or mangling it, and then presenting it to my clients as if it was my original work. If you are going to do this then please also inject a script that displays a large permanent alert on a red background across all web pages that you have similarly inflicted with the words "The quality of this page has been reduced by Vodacom".

Don't get me wrong. I think your objections, and your right to object, are perfectly valid and I don't necessarily disagree with them.

I do disagree though (with anyone, on any topic) when they make a claim based on an assumption. Much better to first ask before making potentially wrong statements.

If you follow my posts, you'll see I often talk about this.

Much better to post "Is this legal or not?" than "I think it's illegal". In the latter case the onus is now on you to provide the proof for your statement. Which is what I did.

To then say it's not the responsibility of the person who made the statement to provide proof is a bit of a cop-out.

 

[MrGray]

Much better to post "Is this legal or not" than "I think it's illegal". In the latter case the onus is now on you to provide the proof for your statement.

Seems like splitting hairs, seriously

I did not say "it is illegal", I said "I think it is not entirely legal" and then gave the reasons for my thinking.

I've mentioned multiple reasons why I (as an individual commenting on a forum conversation) *think* this, ranging from RICA to copyright law. Surely I'm not obligated to consult a lawyer to construct a formal legal argument citing specific acts and precedents every time I happen to think something is not entirely kosher, besides which, Vodacom, or anyone else, is free to respond with why they *think* otherwise.

 

[jannievanzyl]

Seems like splitting hairs, seriously

Maybe, though I don't 'think' so

Guess it's the engineer in me that wants to ensure facts are dealt with as facts and speculation as such.

Any way, this issue will be gone pretty soon.

 

[Keeper]

@jannievanzyl. What does the "Vodacom Rep" below your name mean?

Rep = Representative.

What he says and does represents Vodacom's stance. In this case, cluelessness about the situation, rolling of eyes at users, and asking us whether filtering data is even illegal or not...
:erm: ... Shift+R improves the quality of this image. Shift+A improves the quality of all images on this page.

 

[fM1DRKbzkFqwA]

In this case, cluelessness about the situation,

I think Jannievanzyl is not clueless about this situation.

And I think the legality and ethical issues should be cleared up, because I think data interception (not necessarily modification) is happening far more often than some people here believe, and it's important. But not in this thread.

 

[Keeper]

"Uh, what device is this happening on guyz?"
"Um okay people giff me 48 hours"
"Okay i'll test it after midnight"
"Uhh press F5...or shift F5...or something, I cant remember the difference"
"You're still seeing ugly images? Ok I need more info.. what area are you in? ...is it better or worse than before?"


Yeah, seems like he was "briefed" extremely well

 

[MeercatMilker]

I don't want to get too excited, but it appears to be fixed!

 

[MeercatMilker]

I'm pretty sure the image compression has been solved, thanks!

I still see this javascript in all pages though: http://1.2.3.50/jsi/flash.php?file=gordon.js

 

[PJBadenhorst]

From my side the images seem fine. I also get the Gordon JavaScript flash player implementation injected on my files. I went to the Urban Rivals website and all the flash players (that used to be fine before injecting Gordon) are broken!!! If I browse to a page with HTTPS (no injection) they work. Same page with http (and the injection) and the flash players are messed up.

 

[MeercatMilker]

Now one problem is solved, but now we have another.

 

[MrGray]

Let's not be too harsh on Jannie, folks. At least it's nice to be able to talk to a real human representative of Vodacom and not a call centre zombie

 

[jannievanzyl]

I don't want to get too excited, but it appears to be fixed!

Should be gone by midnight, I believe.

 

[MickeyD]

Let's not be too harsh on Jannie, folks. At least it's nice to be able to talk to a real human representative of Vodacom and not a call centre zombie

What!!! I thought JvZ was an autobot!

 

[jannievanzyl]

Let's not be too harsh on Jannie, folks. At least it's nice to be able to talk to a real human representative of Vodacom and not a call centre zombie

Thanks,

And that's exactly it. I've been on this forum for many years, you might recall the first 'vodacom' post by a certain vodacom3G.

But I allways said I'm not a call centre agent. I'll comfortably outgeek most of you guys (not all!) and, just like you, I prefer to call a spade a spade. Sometimes that means admitting Vodacom just plainly effed-up. And sometimes it means I'll take you on for being illogical or challenge you to provide backing for statements.

But never not have have an open and honest discussion. On any topic. Ever.

And yes, I love "" Seems quite appropriate in dealing with some posts.

 

[jannievanzyl]

And yes, I love "" Seems quite appropriate in dealing with some posts.

"Uh, what device is this happening on guyz?"
"Um okay people giff me 48 hours"
"Okay i'll test it after midnight"
"Uhh press F5...or shift F5...or something, I cant remember the difference"
"You're still seeing ugly images? Ok I need more info.. what area are you in? ...is it better or worse than before?"


Yeah, seems like he was "briefed" extremely well

I rest my case.....

 

[Ockie]

Should be gone by midnight, I believe.

The peeps on here can be so glad I dont have your job Jannie. Their images would have been compressed to hell. A beautiful scenic photo would look like lego land!

Kidding.

 

[fM1DRKbzkFqwA]

FixedForMe(tm)

 

[fM1DRKbzkFqwA]

Let's not be too harsh on Jannie, folks. At least it's nice to be able to talk to a real human representative of Vodacom and not a call centre zombie

Cool head. Listens. Understands. Investigates. Responds. Nothing wrong with that.

 

[Necuno]

hehehe... compressed porn ftl