Warrant of arrest issued for Jacob Zuma

skimread

Executive Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2010
Messages
9,277

If the state do bring up the allegation again that he was poisoned then surely his wife by his wife will sue the state for lying?
 

thechamp

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 26, 2011
Messages
26,006
You seem to know him well. How does he find time & energy to bang all his wives without exacerbating his "already dire health" ?
Show some respect Comrade, you are putting Excalibur in an awkward position, it's frowned upon to ask such things about elders where we come from, how uBaba satisfies his wives is uBaba's business, whether bodyguards lend a helping hand or not is none of our business.
 

Fulcrum29

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
32,070
Why is this puzzling and no one knows what it means? Does layman mean medical specialist these days?
It basically comes down to observation and whether a medical practitioner is necessary for diagnosis. It is a interpretation without professional reasoning.

It like a child's mom determining whether the child is too sick for attending school for example.
 

daveza

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 5, 2004
Messages
38,874
There is no ZK Moteni registered with the hpcsa, there is however a ZK Motene,


A doctor unable to spell his own name on a sick note.
 

MightyQuin

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 6, 2010
Messages
15,461
Lol so if he was healthy in December he cannot be ill again? you can be healthy today and ill tomorrow. His illness cannot be disclosed and he's got the right to that privacy.
You forgot the sarcasm font...
 

Milano

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 7, 2004
Messages
13,888
It basically comes down to observation and whether a medical practitioner is necessary for diagnosis. It is a interpretation without professional reasoning.

It like a child's mom determining whether the child is too sick for attending school for example.
But Zuma is not a child (by age) and his mom never wrote it and the court is not a school so they were.. :unsure:
 

Flanders

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 20, 2003
Messages
11,042

:sneaky:

It seems to be generally well-received by the Twitter peeps,


ignoring parody users.
Indeed.

"He would have long been arrested if he was black, where have you seen a white man arrested let alone charged for such crimes.?"

Shame. Whitey still pulling all the strings in the background. Arresting all those black men. *sulkface*
 

Milano

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 7, 2004
Messages
13,888
Is that like murdering people in a Wimpy where you know there are children and babies? Plus your own supporters working there.
 

Fulcrum29

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
32,070
But Zuma is not a child (by age) and his mom never wrote it and the court is not a school so they were.. :unsure:
Do note that a general practitioner (GP) may also make an layman diagnosis.
 

lkswan747

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2017
Messages
1,135
The warrant cannot be executed due to the fact that he is ill and not in the country (probably visiting the Guptas!)
I believe that the Chinese have built a wonderful new hospital in Wuhan province and I think Zuma should be sent there as a test subject for the Corona virus vaccine.
 

Fulcrum29

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
32,070
Why and who would expect that to meet the requirements of a court when an illness is so dire? So they were.. :unsure:
The sick note is in doubt, hence Jacob Zuma is being compelled. The Daily Maverick has a good article on today's event,


Former president Zuma’s ‘sick note’ results in court issuing warrant for his arrest
By Desiree Erasmus• 4 February 2020

Former South African President Jacob Zuma during his fourth day of testimony at the Commission of Inquiry into Allegations of State Capture, Johannesburg, South Africa, 19 July 2019. (Photo: Mike Hutchings/EPA-EFE)

What is best described as a case of poor planning by the defence team resulted in their client being issued with a warrant of arrest, which will be stayed until the next appearance on 6 May 2020 where a credible explanation is expected to be given.

It should have been among the most irrelevant court appearances in the ongoing saga involving fraud and corruption charges against former president Jacob Zuma, but his defence managed to turn a simple adjournment into an hour of debate over a “so-called medical certificate” bearing the stamp of the South African National Defence Force’s One Military Hospital.

...

Zuma was not present and the medical “sick note” his defence attorney Daniel Mantsha handed to the court provided Justice Dhaya Pillay and prosecutor Advocate Billy Downer SC with little reason to believe the validity of the certificate. Furthermore, Mantsha provided no medical witnesses to speak to the note, or supporting documentation.

To compound matters, Mantsha had ignored correspondence sent to his office on 16 January 2020 by the National Prosecuting Authority asking for medical evidence speaking to the purported illness of Zuma. He had informed the NPA the day before that Zuma would be out of the country seeking medical attention on the hearing date.

The actual “sick note” presented by Mantsha provided no supporting documentation on who the attending doctor was, simply calling him “ZK Motene”. Alongside the purported illness not disclosed to the court was a “layman’s diagnosis”.

A call by Daily Maverick to One Military Hospital’s human resources department confirmed that a Dr ZK Motene worked for the Presidential Medical Unit.

Pillay went at length to try to diagnose the medical certificate while Mantsha, who appeared to know very little about it, insisted it must be accepted because it had “an original stamp” from the hospital.

He also told the court that the health of a former president “is a matter of national security and a matter of our armed services”, followed by what can be referenced as a “third force” jibe.


“It is absurd for the state to doubt the admissibility of a medical note by our military unless the prosecution team does not represent the same state [in which] this military resides,” said Mantsha.

He said Dr Motene was with Zuma in the yet to be disclosed jurisdiction.

“This quest for warrant of arrest is spiteful and vindictive and persecution of Mr Zuma,” said Mantsha.

He said if the court issued the warrant “the people will ask what kind of courts are these where there is no sensitivity”, adding that the public knew Zuma was “an elderly man seeking medical treatment”.

Advocate Billy Downer SC, acting for the state, dismissed the notion that the court was being vindictive.

Instead he told the court that it was “extraordinarily uncollegial to leave unanswered pertinent invitations from the state, in good faith, to be able to assist the court with medical evidence to explain his absence from court today”. He called the note a “so-called medical certificate”, adding that there was no supporting evidence to add credibility.

“The state does not consent to its admission. It remains hearsay evidence, the witness is not before court, there is no evidential weight, it proves nothing; moreover it raises many more questions than it answers. Who is the doctor, where does he come from, what is the so-called illness, why is it a layman’s diagnosis?

“These are the questions I want you to put to the doctor. We should not have reached this stage quibbling about the terms of an inadmissible medical certificate with an added desperate application [by Mantsha] that the matter should be postponed to clear up these issues.”

“We [the court] don’t know he is sick. We’ve heard reports in the media,” said Downer.
The article is possibly alluding to why the date on the sick note was changed. Zuma's legal counsel is wasting the court's time and they should be by now honestly reported to the council and reprimanded by the court.

Wherever Zuma is he is being accompanied by Motene who seems to be as legit as the sick note. Strange that no one knows as to where Motene went with Zuma.

Other than Billy Downer's strong words, Zuma and his legal counsel are being handled with kid gloves.
 
Top