See hidden discussions | Win great prizes | Get free support
From my perspective they did hold him back, but there are other questions, whether they were bystanders or passengers involved in the incident, and once the bakkie door was opened by the victim, allowed the 'victim' to attack the 'attacker'? Perspective matters here.It was quite evident what they intended to do. He fled for his life and nearly killed another person in the process.
That's ridiculous form the media.From my perspective they did hold him back, but there are other questions, whether they were bystanders or passengers involved in the incident, and once the bakkie door was opened by the victim, allowed the 'victim' to attack the 'attacker'? Perspective matters here.
The victim is already having nightmares, and the media, or TimesLive, believes the victim to be spooked by white middle-aged men.
We don't have the whole story, my issue since the beginning was how the media reported the story.
I observed 3 passengers exiting the vehicle. When did the 2 drivers exit their respective vehicles? You don't know, who knows, maybe it was the 'victim' who attacked and said white male retaliated, but that won't suit the narrative since nightmares about white middle-aged men... Without the whole story, one may only assume with what is available.What I observe is that the Tazz has 3 people in it. The driver and two passengers. The two passengers exit the car when white male was attacking the driver.
You can't just moer someone stukkend and expect to jump into your vehicle and nonchalantly drive away. For every action there's a reaction.I am assuming we need to also the take out and ignore that he was being mobbed by 3 men while in sitting position. Because its perfectly logical to remain stationary while being mobbed.