surface
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2006
- Messages
- 26,595
Tbh, on more than one occasion I felt like publishing the information of the doxers. It so easy, but all the more reason to not to, two wrongs don't make a right.
Tbh, on more than one occasion I felt like publishing the information of the doxers. It so easy, but all the more reason to not to, two wrongs don't make a right.
Did I say that? Or did I say that it was extra dof and inbred to do it on camera? Read, think. This is not twitter. No need to be reactionary and jump to dof conclusions.So off camera is fine?
Diplomacy: The art of sending somebody to hell in such a way that he looks forward to the trip.I am not fishing. I was responding to his post originally. But seeing as he doesn't want to call this degenerate names I'm asking if that courtesy will be extended to other, similar arseholes, or only to this one. I think that's a fair question.
Because if it doesn't extend to others it means he is secretly in agreement with this violent savage.
Under? Worst sleuth job ever then.EFF and law abiding? that is new. I hope law will catch up with EFF founders some day. Malema has been flying under radar because of state capture etc but hopefully that ends some day.
So it would not be too dof if he did it off camera. That's the reverse implication.Did I say that? Or did I say that it was extra dof and inbred to do it on camera? Read, think. This is not twitter. No need to be reactionary and jump to dof conclusions.
It would have indicated some greater level of logical thought, yes.So it would not be too dof if he did it off camera. That's the reverse implication.
No, that is your own dof assumption. Go back to twitter. Trying sooo hard to twist things.So it would not be too dof if he did it off camera. That's the reverse implication.
Problem with video “evidence” is the skills of the editor. Or the lack of publishing the events that lead up to the published event.In this case there is a video. No need for stories, we can see what happens on our own.
Comarade "Craig" can safely be ignored. Once he reported me for racism because I posted my customary Orc picture in a Ramaphosa bashing thread. #GoFigureWell, the perp’s political views are racist, but you wished violence on him just a few posts ago. Thought the general consensus here was no violence at all?
No one is interested in your MyBb trials and tribulations, stay on topic or get out of my thread.Comarade "Craig" can safely be ignored. Once he reported me for racism because I posted my customary Orc picture in a Ramaphosa bashing thread. #GoFigure
![]()
Yet amnesty was granted to murderers at the TRC because their actions were determined to be politically motivated.
It has everything to do with it, it is touted as the reason for the attack.
So it would not be too dof if he did it off camera. That's the reverse implication.
Comarade "Craig" can safely be ignored. Once he reported me for racism because I posted my customary Orc picture in a Ramaphosa bashing thread. #GoFigure
![]()
Can you explain?
*The EFF is a political partyThey told me that those people said something about my EFF* cap that I was wearing and that they were calling me the k-word. I didn't respond, because I didn't hear them
Ask yourself: Was he punched because he was black, was he punched because of the EFF cap, or both? Or probably "other things" happen before the punch came. But of course: some choose to see one reason only.I wonder why I would have done that.![]()
It could also be that the attacker is a po3s common piece of trash, could it not?Ask yourself: Was he punched because he was black, was he punched because of the EFF cap, or both? Or probably "other things" happen before the punch came. But of course: some choose to see one reason only.
Ask yourself: Was he punched because he was black, was he punched because of the EFF cap, or both? Or probably "other things" happen before the punch came. But of course: some choose to see one reason only.
It could also be that the attacker is a po3s common piece of trash, could it not?