"Owned" is a pretty strong word. So is "native". Let's not get into the argument about which nation was here first.
My view is that if you try and rub this misinterpretation of history in the faces of people whose ancestors have been here since before 1600 you are bound to get trouble.
You are right, native was a bad choice of words. By the definition we are natives, and if you thought I was trying to bring up a who got here first argument, then I apologise in my lack of clarity.
What I was trying to portray was that South Africa has "evolved" many times under many different government, empires, regimes, corporations whatever. They have all changed names to suite the current ruling entity. Its happened many times in the past its likely its going to happen in the future as well.
Every single government that has come into play here has instituted name changes, done land grabs, redesigned flags, fought for freedom (from their perspectives) etc etc
I was not getting into a "who got here first" argument, I was merely pointing out that all previous governments have basically done the same. I dont approve of the practice but a name is just a name. If you feel you need it to cling onto your culture then I cant understand the lack of depth of that culture.
The name of South Africa is not important. The people who live in the world are.