Smiley_lauf
Expert Member
- Joined
- May 5, 2004
- Messages
- 1,872
Hi There
Firstly, let me make it clear that I do not want to start a flame here. This post is ascertain the characteristic of the users of highspeed/broadband internet services in SA.
A little background: South African telecom system has been running on a monopoly for many years now. There is no real competition for this service, not even in the near future (even though Neotel will be in the market). Access to the highspeed internet does not come cheap (source: see all the adverts and TELKOM pricing structure). There are many disgruntled and unsatisfied customers. Reasons for this unhappiness are many, but to mention a few: high costs, poor service delivery, unjustifiable usage and bandwidth restrictions, ignorance, etc.
Very recently the ICASA CEO stated that there is not enough evidence to suggest unrealistic pricing of ADSL services by TELKOM, and this has angered the ADSL users even more; when, infact, there is sufficient evidence to the contrary (see todays posts here).
The question arises as to why there is a difference in perception betweeen USERS, service providers (TELKOM) and regulating bodies (ICASA). We know that TELKOM and ICASA share the same umbilical cord and so will have motivations to protect their interests. But, why is it that USERS are still very unhappy?
Is it that TELKOM/ICASA know that the people who can afford these services are not the massess (low-medium income), but rather the upper middle-high income bracket people. And so, they do not see why they should make this service widely affordable and available (and thus accessible).
I am asking here, do we know what the current socioeconomic and demographic composition is of the ADSL users (outside bussiness)? Is there separated by racial affiliation, or socioeconomic. Who really uses ADSL services currently?
There has been a national call to narrow the global digital divide by making internet more accesible to the massess of Africa, but there does not seem to be a sense of urgency from TELKOM/ICASA to make this happen. The massess in this country are in the low-middle income bracket, and are mostly African black. Is the answer to these questions not that obvious? When developed nations (UK, US, and Japan, etc) make these communication services accessible (not just very affordable, cheap) when a vast majoriity of theor population is educated and informed, then one wonders where our prioroties lie as a nation still in its developmenatal infancy.
It is time to wake up: USERS, who can afford these services complain about ADSL pricing, service etc, are doing it not because it is expensive (that too), but because it will help make communication services more accessible to the more needy in our society.
Thank you for reading.
SM
Firstly, let me make it clear that I do not want to start a flame here. This post is ascertain the characteristic of the users of highspeed/broadband internet services in SA.
A little background: South African telecom system has been running on a monopoly for many years now. There is no real competition for this service, not even in the near future (even though Neotel will be in the market). Access to the highspeed internet does not come cheap (source: see all the adverts and TELKOM pricing structure). There are many disgruntled and unsatisfied customers. Reasons for this unhappiness are many, but to mention a few: high costs, poor service delivery, unjustifiable usage and bandwidth restrictions, ignorance, etc.
Very recently the ICASA CEO stated that there is not enough evidence to suggest unrealistic pricing of ADSL services by TELKOM, and this has angered the ADSL users even more; when, infact, there is sufficient evidence to the contrary (see todays posts here).
The question arises as to why there is a difference in perception betweeen USERS, service providers (TELKOM) and regulating bodies (ICASA). We know that TELKOM and ICASA share the same umbilical cord and so will have motivations to protect their interests. But, why is it that USERS are still very unhappy?
Is it that TELKOM/ICASA know that the people who can afford these services are not the massess (low-medium income), but rather the upper middle-high income bracket people. And so, they do not see why they should make this service widely affordable and available (and thus accessible).
I am asking here, do we know what the current socioeconomic and demographic composition is of the ADSL users (outside bussiness)? Is there separated by racial affiliation, or socioeconomic. Who really uses ADSL services currently?
There has been a national call to narrow the global digital divide by making internet more accesible to the massess of Africa, but there does not seem to be a sense of urgency from TELKOM/ICASA to make this happen. The massess in this country are in the low-middle income bracket, and are mostly African black. Is the answer to these questions not that obvious? When developed nations (UK, US, and Japan, etc) make these communication services accessible (not just very affordable, cheap) when a vast majoriity of theor population is educated and informed, then one wonders where our prioroties lie as a nation still in its developmenatal infancy.
It is time to wake up: USERS, who can afford these services complain about ADSL pricing, service etc, are doing it not because it is expensive (that too), but because it will help make communication services more accessible to the more needy in our society.
Thank you for reading.
SM