RedViking
Nord of the South
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2012
- Messages
- 58,139
South Africa - FAKE news has become a world wide problem and spreading it might even be punishable under law.
But there is also a different kind of fake news spread daily.
MEDIA.
Spreading half truths or conveniently leave out information, using headings to gather clicks, as the original information just won't be good enough.
Should media and press be allowed to twist the facts and only display half truths?
When media quote from other articles, should they be allowed to leave out important information changings the meaning of what has been said?
As FAKE news also grew rapidly on social media during this recent pandemic, media has used the opportunity spread information that causes fear before they are certain of the facts, using keywords like "Allegedly" "Possibly" "Expert Opinion" or creating headings to serve their personal opinions, but taken out of context and leaving out content.
Maybe an example:
Source: "Dogs can kill you when you make them angry and is advised to be on a leash when taken to the beach." said Minister of Health.
Media: "Dogs kill and should be on leash says Minister"
Or as News24 like to put it: https://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/...-foundation-for-africa-vaccine-story-20200405
How far should the media be allowed to twist the truth or take something out of context?
Should they be held accountable for the information they spread?
Can they be reported and will action be taken?
But there is also a different kind of fake news spread daily.
MEDIA.
Spreading half truths or conveniently leave out information, using headings to gather clicks, as the original information just won't be good enough.
Should media and press be allowed to twist the facts and only display half truths?
When media quote from other articles, should they be allowed to leave out important information changings the meaning of what has been said?
As FAKE news also grew rapidly on social media during this recent pandemic, media has used the opportunity spread information that causes fear before they are certain of the facts, using keywords like "Allegedly" "Possibly" "Expert Opinion" or creating headings to serve their personal opinions, but taken out of context and leaving out content.
Maybe an example:
Source: "Dogs can kill you when you make them angry and is advised to be on a leash when taken to the beach." said Minister of Health.
Media: "Dogs kill and should be on leash says Minister"
Or as News24 like to put it: https://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/...-foundation-for-africa-vaccine-story-20200405
How far should the media be allowed to twist the truth or take something out of context?
Should they be held accountable for the information they spread?
Can they be reported and will action be taken?
Last edited:
