why sentech is not to be used for bussiness apps

loosecannon · Sep 17, 2004

the bellow is what happens when you attempt to upload a file from sentech the upload is a whoping fast 3.2kBs ... to a ADSL machine ... usualy pings on this tunnel are 200-500ms

<blockquote id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">
PING 192.168.99.5 (192.168.99.5): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.99.5: icmp_seq=0 ttl=63 time=24653.998 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.99.5: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=23693.162 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.99.5: icmp_seq=2 ttl=63 time=23977.289 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.99.5: icmp_seq=3 ttl=63 time=24715.975 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.99.5: icmp_seq=4 ttl=63 time=25352.814 ms
--- 192.168.99.5 ping statistics ---
30 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 83% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 23693.162/24478.648/25352.814/586.445 ms
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">

loosecannon · Sep 17, 2004

as soon as the upload stops ...

<blockquote id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote">
PING 192.168.99.5 (192.168.99.5): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.99.5: icmp_seq=0 ttl=63 time=360.086 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.99.5: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=284.948 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.99.5: icmp_seq=2 ttl=63 time=480.893 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.99.5: icmp_seq=3 ttl=63 time=644.915 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.99.5: icmp_seq=4 ttl=63 time=598.872 ms
--- 192.168.99.5 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 284.948/473.943/644.915/136.799 ms
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote">

bb_matt · Sep 17, 2004

Yes, there's something totally whack about thier bandwidth management that makes any kinda p2p activity deadly to all other protocols. I can't surf the net with bittorrent going for instance.

It's been mentioned by I think more than one member of these forums that Scamtek upstream traffic is significantly Fux0r3d.

So, you want to download a linux 3 CD release the moment it's hot of the press ? , sorry, with Spintech, you may as well get it posted to you, it'll take less time.

Or if your with Hellkom, max. out your ADSL account in the first week of a new month - whoop - no more international bandwidth for 3 weeks !

bdt · Sep 18, 2004

bb_matt, interesting that you can't do www with torrent(S) going. I've been doing just that for the last 2 days. Obviously with the torrent hogging (I use ABC, torrent set to highest priority) the line I have to wait for pages a bit, but it's not as if www just flat-out dies on me!
Tried ftp (filezilla, to ftp.is.*)- is fine too.. *shrug* YMMV.

nocilah · Sep 18, 2004

well since the speed fix I had a bit torrent coming down (Azureus v2.1.04) and no real probs with WWW... but if I try FTP that's a joke...

If in need I simply turn the BitTorrent off... I mean.. there are lotsa of hours where I am not at my machine.

myWireless 128, 64, 48, 16 - depends on its mood.

Comrade Borris · Sep 18, 2004

I noticed that my browsing has improved a lot in the last two days. Before i had to stop my torrents to do serious browsing (as in less than 2 mins for a page to load). At the moment i am pulling 17K international torrents and still browsing fine

Maybe it because i had a power outage in my area and none of the offices on my tower have re-connected because it's the weekend...

<div align="left"> |256k| |29%| |<s>66</s> 12 (WTF?)/ HYDEPARK| [V][

!][V]</div id="left">

why sentech is not to be used for bussiness apps

loosecannon

Senior Member

loosecannon

Senior Member

bb_matt

Executive Member

bdt

Executive Member

nocilah

Banned

Comrade Borris

Well-Known Member