News articles in Africa (including South Africa) often make Huawei look bad.
The typical cycle:
1. New corruption story appears
2. Follow up articles give updates on the developments
3. If the result is bad for Huawei, the stories are repeated for several weeks. On the other hand, if the case is dropped or Huawei wins, there may be no mention of that at all.
This is of interest to me because, personally, I like Huawei. I follow Huawei stories in the news, and noticed that many in Africa are negative.
Do you think that Huawei operations in Africa are that different from their operations in Europe and Asia? If yes, please explain. Thank you.
The typical cycle:
1. New corruption story appears
2. Follow up articles give updates on the developments
3. If the result is bad for Huawei, the stories are repeated for several weeks. On the other hand, if the case is dropped or Huawei wins, there may be no mention of that at all.
This is of interest to me because, personally, I like Huawei. I follow Huawei stories in the news, and noticed that many in Africa are negative.
Do you think that Huawei operations in Africa are that different from their operations in Europe and Asia? If yes, please explain. Thank you.
Last edited: