Why you don't really have free will

B

Bobbin

Executive Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2009
Messages
6,773
Ponderer said:
Care to explain the difference between "true random" and "random".
Click to expand...
True random means complete absence of causality. You can never predict it no matter what.

Random can be predicted in theory, we just use the term due to there being too many unknown variables.
 
P

Ponderer

Expert Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2019
Messages
3,013
Bobbin said:
True random means complete absence of causality. You can never predict it no matter what.

Random can be predicted in theory, we just use the term due to there being too many unknown variables.
Click to expand...
Can you perhaps give an example that differentiates between "true random" and "random"?
 
saor

saor

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 3, 2012
Messages
21,355
Ponderer said:
How do you expect me to answer such a silly question.
Click to expand...
The question was intended to show that an observer cannot differentiate between the actions of an agent with choice and one without. Gods you're unpleasant.
 
P

Ponderer

Expert Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2019
Messages
3,013
saor said:
The question was intended to show that an observer cannot differentiate between the actions of an agent with choice and one without. Gods you're unpleasant.
Click to expand...
You absolutely sure of that?

<edit>
BTW - the ad hominem is noted and ignored.
 
Last edited:
B

Bobbin

Executive Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2009
Messages
6,773
Ponderer said:
Can you perhaps give an example that differentiates between "true random" and "random"?
Click to expand...
Brownian motion might be considered random but not truly random. I believe it's just erratic enough to be ridiculously difficult to predict. Like the break in a game of pool, where the balls end up is random but technically you could predict it knowing all the variables.

I honestly cannot think of something truly random. Some say quantum physics might depict true random but of that I'm not entirely sure. True random is a concept, like infinity, that isn't easy to articulate.

Question to all forumites, what's an example of something truly random? Help me out here :)

I guess anything paranormal could be true random but then how would it be observable is what I'd want to know.
 
Last edited:
Arksun

Arksun

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2010
Messages
1,530
Bobbin said:
I honestly cannot think of something truly random. Some say quantum physics might depict true random but of that I'm not entirely sure. True random is a concept, like infinity, that isn't easy to articulate.

Question to all forumites, what's an example of something truly random? Help me out here :)

I guess anything paranormal could be true random but then how would it be observable is what I'd want to know.
Click to expand...
I've tried. I cant think of anything truly random either. I don't think such an occurence exists. Sure, a lot of people make the argument that you'd have to go subatomic to find that, but I'll bet good money that when enough understanding of quantum physics is achieved, it will be found that wont find anything random there either.
 
Prawnapple

Prawnapple

Expert Member
Joined
May 18, 2015
Messages
1,616
There seems to be some issues regarding free will here. Proponents of free will in this thread are saying the agent is capable of making a decision and thus, free will. By that narrow definition, sure, take your definition of free will and let it comfort you . I don't care about that. I care about statements like, "Humans are able to make decisions free from the constraints of cause and effect (causal determinacy).

Argument 1:
1) Libertarian free will states you make decisions free from cause and effect (causal determinism).
2) You cannot make any decisions which are free from a cause or an effect.
3) Thus, you have no free will.
...
Correct

Argument 2:
1) Soul / Mind / Consciousness are not matter / physical
2) Your thoughts come from your mind / soul / consciousness thus they don't need to obey the laws of cause and effect (causal determinism)
3) Thus, your thoughts are free and you have libertarian free will
...
Wrong. Proof required for existence of the soul / mind / consciousness. Until demonstrable evidence / proof has been provided, no luck here.

Argument 3:
1) The universe is indeterministic (events are not caused, or not caused deterministically).
2) Indeterminism is the belief that no event is certain and the entire outcome of anything is probabilistic.
3) You have no free will in a probabilistic OR random universe
4) You still have no free will
...
Correct. If the universe is random, you have no free will either as everything is just random occurrence and per chance.

Conclusion: You have no libertarian free will and you are not able to make decisions free from causal determinism, neither are you able to make libertarian free will decisions in an indeterminate universe.
 
P

Ponderer

Expert Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2019
Messages
3,013
Prawnapple said:
There seems to be some issues regarding free will here. Proponents of free will in this thread are saying the agent is capable of making a decision and thus, free will. By that narrow definition, sure, take your definition of free will and let it comfort you . I don't care about that. I care about statements like, "Humans are able to make decisions free from the constraints of cause and effect (causal determinacy).

Argument 1:
1) Libertarian free will states you make decisions free from cause and effect (causal determinism).
2) You cannot make any decisions which are free from a cause or an effect.
3) Thus, you have no free will.
...
Correct

Argument 2:
1) Soul / Mind / Consciousness are not matter / physical
2) Your thoughts come from your mind / soul / consciousness thus they don't need to obey the laws of cause and effect (causal determinism)
3) Thus, your thoughts are free and you have libertarian free will
...
Wrong. Proof required for existence of the soul / mind / consciousness. Until demonstrable evidence / proof has been provided, no luck here.

Argument 3:
1) The universe is indeterministic (events are not caused, or not caused deterministically).
2) Indeterminism is the belief that no event is certain and the entire outcome of anything is probabilistic.
3) You have no free will in a probabilistic OR random universe
4) You still have no free will
...
Correct. If the universe is random, you have no free will either as everything is just random occurrence and per chance.

Conclusion: You have no libertarian free will and you are not able to make decisions free from causal determinism, neither are you able to make libertarian free will decisions in an indeterminate universe.
Click to expand...
Can you please demonstrate your reasoning (of/in your post) by applying it to the "game of pool" example.
That's if you can.
I will understand the underlying reason if you cannot do so, or refuse to do so.
Let's see if you are waffling (talking out of your a$$).
 
LD50

LD50

Expert Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2019
Messages
1,608
@Sinbad decided to move overseas. I think the man just went and used his free will :unsure: :eek::eek:
Hugo!!! Bel die polisie!!!!!!
 
S

saturnz

Honorary Master
Joined
May 3, 2005
Messages
13,288
Prawnapple said:
There seems to be some issues regarding free will here. Proponents of free will in this thread are saying the agent is capable of making a decision and thus, free will. By that narrow definition, sure, take your definition of free will and let it comfort you...
Click to expand...
thats not the issue for me, the issue is how to explain to a judge in a court of law that I have no free will where free will is defined within this context as the choice to abide or break the social contract
 
Arksun

Arksun

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2010
Messages
1,530
saturnz said:
thats not the issue for me, the issue is how to explain to a judge in a court of law that I have no free will where free will is defined within this context as the choice to abide or break the social contract
Click to expand...
It will be irrelevant in a court room. In the same way cause and effect led you to commit crimes, cause and effect will lead a judge to convict you. Free will or no.
 
P

Ponderer

Expert Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2019
Messages
3,013
Arksun said:
It will be irrelevant in a court room. In the same way cause and effect led you to commit crimes, cause and effect will lead a judge to convict you. Free will or no.
Click to expand...
So a criminal cannot be blamed for committing a crime?
"It's not my fault that I raped a 2 year old."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top