Nothing just that one is harder to prove then the other.What has the 99% thing got to do with the truth?
I never asked you a question Prawnapple did, I asked you for proof, which you haven't given and you followed with a question not an answer. Still the most true answer I can give and is an actual answer unlike yours.You asked me a question which I answered.
You were unhappy with the answer, retorted with a (silly/irrational) snarky comment, and then have the audacity to play the victim.
Cool ignore everything your good at it.I don't see how your problem is now also my problem.
Yes it does (I would like to believe as many true things as possible), when I don't know I say I believe this but don't have a definitive answer I have believed untrue things and I'm sure I still do but I'm willing to change when the proof is presented to me.Whether or not you believe/accept something to be true/false has nothing to do with whether or not it is in fact true/false.
The only thing that changes is your belief/acceptance thereof.
Stating a fact like you did with no proof is ignorant.
Huh!! when I say your argument is of ignorance is that not pointing it out, would you like me quote your post with Ignorance ======>>>>>>> what ponderer said <<<<<=======Ignorance.You keep saying that I am ignorant, but have not yet pointed out the ignorance.
Ignorance is for example to argue that "the non-belief that GOD exists" is different from "the belief that GOD does not exist".
Back to the circular argument again did you not get enough fiber this morning?