Wi-Fi 5 and Wi-Fi 6 tested

Caveat: Not all infrastructure devices are created equal.

A decent WiFi 5 device might outperform a poor WiFi 6 device. Well almost certainly will...
SISO SIMO MISO MIMO etc. etc.
 
would have been better for qualified network engineer to do the testing #justsaying
 
Latency seems to be the most significant improvement. If you don't need improved latency over WiFi then it's not worth pursuing yet.

At least that's what I took away from reading this.
 
I switched to a WiFi 6 mesh for the estate and office complex. Not much of a noticeable difference except lower latency, which was badly needed.
 
wifi 6 is not about speed but about efficient use of the radio frequency bands.A by-product of efficiency is better speeds , latency , jitter etc.
 
also wifi 6 is more about trying to close the gap on ethernet (ie full duplex) , although it will always be a half duplex technology , by splitting up the frequency channels into small sub channels its trying to become "more full duplex".I guess when most devices are using wifi 6 and in highly dense environments then you will see the benefits.
 
Once you have enough bandwidth for your transaction, latency has a much bigger impact on performance.
 
I have a great experience with WiFi 6, so I'm always surprised when I see these relatively low numbers in articles like this. WiFi 6 and MIMO is supposed to result in combined speeds of multiple devices that is greater than what any device could achieve alone, yet on one device I can outperform the combined bandwidth in the article. I have though found the MyBroadband speed test app struggles on high bandwidth connections because it completes in just over a second, and before downloads have a chance to reach their "cruising speed".

S22 Ultra + EAP660HD:

1648504737701.jpeg
 
Think it would’ve been more useful to compare the two with a gigabit fibre line
 
You tested wifi 6 on a 200/100 meg line.....
Like buying a Ferrari and testing the radio....
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter