Will 'magic' Molefe spot Eskom's BEE thieves?

MickeyD

RIP
Joined
Oct 4, 2010
Messages
139,117
Cape Town - The proponents of Eskom's black economic empowerment (BEE) procurement policies are among the state-owned power monopoly's biggest thieves, energy analyst Ted Blom told the Cape Town Press Club on Friday afternoon.

He said that one of the biggest beneficiaries of the 51% black ownership requirement - above and beyond the mining charter requirement of 26% - was Deputy President Cyril Ramaphosa's company, Shanduka. The infamous and politically connected Gupta family have now also emerged as also beneficiaries.

Blom said with Eskom's problems growing by the day, he expected that new acting chief executive officer Brian Molefe would either be "switching off the lights of Eskom" or it would be switching off Molefe's lights before the end of the year.

The BEE suppliers to Eskom "are earning more than double the profits" that the other suppliers are earning "with zero value added", he said, noting that the Minister of Public Enterprises Lynne Brown had not divulged the quantum or the price of the BEE coal supplies to Eskom.

BEE preferential treatment

Currently long-term contractors supply Eskom with coal - which supplied their coal-fired power plants - at R200 a tonne and BEE complaint suppliers are believed to be at R460 or so a tonne "plus R200 a tonne transport costs". Blom said it was not known what price Shanduka was getting, but he assumed as a BEE compliant company "it shares in this preferential treatment".

It was his estimate "and you don't have to be a genius" to work out the figures "but I suspect that two million tonnes of coal a year" was being supplied by Shanduka. This was worth about R56m a month "extra... that is on top of what the other suppliers are scoring... is it a conflict of interest (for Ramaphosa)?... it probably is."

Shanduka's interests in Glencore - controlled by Ivan Glasenburg - are managed by Glencore, the same company that was selling export-grade coal to Eskom at a massive premium, Blom pointed out.

Now the Gupta family's coal mine situated next to Mpumalanga's world environmental site is the latest BEE beneficiary. This "as far as I am aware" is not properly permitted and licensed, said Blom.

Executives placed under political pressure

It appeared that Eskom executives had been placed under political pressure to give the Gupta family the contract to supply coal from their Brakfontein mine.

The Sunday Times reported that ousted Eskom boss Zola Tsotsi bent the power utility's rules to push through a R400m a year coal supply contract to the Guptas - who jumped into the national spotlight when they illegally used the Waterkloof Air Force Base to fly in their family for a lavish wedding.

Turning to the appointment of current Transnet group chief executive Molefe as acting Eskom CEO, Blom said: "I must tell you how amazed I have been at the superfast run of events since the surprise parachuting in of Mr Molefe a week ago."

"Not only has he claimed to have nearly turned Eskom around financially in a week, he rubbished opinions of bankers and analysts that Eskom was in a financially precarious position and desperately needed bailouts and hefty price increases."

A week of Molefe spin

"I trust you will hold him to that and demand that Eskom withdraw its misguided 25% price increase application, as well as any other claims during the current MYPD period to 2018."

Blom said the demand and supply gap of the state monopoly was near double the figures produced by Molefe to MPs in Cape Town this week - 6 000 MW rather than 3 000 MW.

"He (Molefe) has informed us that he could abolish load-shedding before the end of the year as he only needs to find a spare 3 000 MW in the current Eskom system," Blom noted.

"My observation is ... at this rate he should have Eskom wrapped up well within a month and should perhaps be seconded to the National Treasury where similar magic would be most welcome and he should thereafter be rewarded with a 'non removable statue'."

Eskom has priced out the private sector

Blom said Eskom has priced out the private sector from investing in generation capacity, such as a coal-fired power station.

Probably the only way to solve the energy crisis is to turn to solar power and importing power producing barges - which are already being used by other African states - to supply electricity.

He said solar is already being produced about 40 cents per kilowatt-hour cheaper than electricity. "Solar has become very dear to my heart.. the cost of solar has dropped to about 80c/kWh."

The Eskom price to consumers is about R1.20/kWh and would have to rise substantially if costs of empowerment, overpriced power plants and the build programme were to be absorbed.

Donwald Pressly, Fin24

Source: http://www.fin24.com/Economy/Eskom/Will-magic-Molefe-spot-Eskoms-BEE-thieves-20150424
 

akescpt

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 12, 2008
Messages
22,455
Solar equipment needs to be replaced. This is my concern. Isn't your 'savings' lost when you have to replace equipment every 5 to 7+ years. It isn't cheap either.
 

itareanlnotani

Executive Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2008
Messages
6,760
Solar equipment needs to be replaced. This is my concern. Isn't your 'savings' lost when you have to replace equipment every 5 to 7+ years. It isn't cheap either.

Where do you get 5-7 years from?

Panels have 25+ year lifetimes (and are still +-80% of original rating at that point)
Inverters typically in the 10 year lifetimes, some rated to 20 years.

Its all moot though, as the REIPPP contract lengths are for shorter terms anyway.

Eskom doesn't care about what it costs either, as they're not paying for it. They have contracts to purchase the electricity for a period of time at a specific R/kw pricing. The "risk" is all with the vendor.

Wind is the cheapest way to supply electricity currently, closest followed by Solar, then Nuclear, and then Coal.

Wind and Solar are non-polluting, and the running costs are minimal - no fuel costs.
Nuclear and Coal have high running costs, environmental damage - mining... , and fuel costs.
 

FNfal

Executive Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2011
Messages
6,425
"This was worth about R56m a month "extra... that is on top of what the other suppliers are scoring... is it a conflict of interest (for Ramaphosa)?... it probably is."

What an absolute shambles R56 million a month over and above for cyril .

Any doubt about going off the grid is removes and all available resources should be directed to buying and installing solar systems .
Very soon electricity from Eskom will be to expensive .
The vicious cycle is in full swing , electricity theft will accelerate because of the price with less and less people paying. Eskoms recovery will plummet and more and more tax payers money will be paid to Eskom .
 

LazyLion

King of de Jungle
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
105,603
The question is... is anybody surprised?

(and shouldn't this thread be in the Eskom section?)
 

akescpt

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 12, 2008
Messages
22,455
Where do you get 5-7 years from?

Panels have 25+ year lifetimes (and are still +-80% of original rating at that point)
Inverters typically in the 10 year lifetimes, some rated to 20 years.

Its all moot though, as the REIPPP contract lengths are for shorter terms anyway.

Eskom doesn't care about what it costs either, as they're not paying for it. They have contracts to purchase the electricity for a period of time at a specific R/kw pricing. The "risk" is all with the vendor.

Wind is the cheapest way to supply electricity currently, closest followed by Solar, then Nuclear, and then Coal.

Wind and Solar are non-polluting, and the running costs are minimal - no fuel costs.
Nuclear and Coal have high running costs, environmental damage - mining... , and fuel costs.

Dude I was preferring to domestic.
 

LaraC

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 11, 2014
Messages
42,675
It is sad that some politicians are allowed to abuse their power at the expense of the country.
Would Eskom have been in this position if they were not subjected to BEE or undue influence from Government?
 

richjdavies

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2013
Messages
2,098
Why do you need batteries... we're talking grid here?

The other generators that push and pull harder and those big dams at Ingula and Drackensburg are your battery.

The inverters will probably not last the full 20 years (more like 5 years). But also when the panels have done 20 years, they aren't 'dead' they are just only producing say 70% of the total output, so it's worth replacing them. The end-of-life panels are also worth a substantial proportion of the 'new' value to recycling companies.

Remember, that's the same for Coal-fired plants:
- The boilers as a whole get replaced every 5-20 years
- The generators/dynamos get replaced every 2-5 years
- the fuel is replaced every second :)
The fact this hasn't happened is why only 50% of the grid is available right now
 

grok

Honorary Master
Joined
Dec 20, 2007
Messages
28,671
It appeared that Eskom executives had been placed under political pressure to give the Gupta family the contract to supply coal from their Brakfontein mine.

Happens when you give the inmates the keys to the assylum..
 
Top