No, it wont.
The issue is that it uses the same amount of power to make a geyser hot as it does to keep it warm. So there is no net gain by turning it off.
The only thing that would be worth while is to turn geysers off during peak times to shift that load to an off peak time. That would be pointless though because there is no off peak time currently for us to use to heat the geysers, load shedding is happening 24hours a day now.
When we lived in JHB they had a system to do this kind of thing, called a ripple relay and it would shut your geyser off remotely twice a day, possibly it was actually off all day I'm not 100% sure.
It totally wrecked our geysers though and even though they were less than 5 years old they would regularly need new thermostats and valves, then eventually rupture.
I have heard of electricians who have suggested this kind of thing but a) they do the repairs b) would you trust someone who should know mathematically why this would not work to do electrical work on your house ?
*In the first world where the problem is dealing with a massive spike at peak times then yes it could work*
I think its also been shown that if every single household converted to either a gas or solar geyser it still wouldn't fix loadshedding.
Residential power is not actually the biggest power sucker, its industrial. I remember way back in 2008/9 someone proved that if we shut down a few of those smelting plants we would be mostly ok.
He was fired for his statement as it didn't go down well with Rio Tinto. Also shutting down those big industries would shut down those jobs we like so much.
have a read here :
As of 2019, the industry sector was the leading electricity consumer in South Africa, with up to 56 percent of the total consumption.
www.statista.com
View attachment 1339792