elf_lord_ZC5
Honorary Master
Most people will either keep running a out of date win10 (assuming M$ does not disable it at some point) or be forced to start using linux.
Not an issue here, Linux is more than good enough.
Most people will either keep running a out of date win10 (assuming M$ does not disable it at some point) or be forced to start using linux.
Win10 was already M$ emulating Apple and Linux.... the only things they do is copy ideas from others and try to force the market towards themselves.... they are basically pirates.So I had a quick look and it appears that Apple supports hardware give-or-take 8 years old, on their latest OS. Maybe Microsoft is looking to emulate their model a bit more closely?
It's better than it used to be but for many things even win10 is better. The disparate communities are stuck in a "don't rock the boat" mentality where they design for themselves rather than actual users who get confused or frustrated with command line.Not an issue here, Linux is more than good enough.
I'm not entirely sure. Laptop sales eclipse desktop sales by a very significant margin and is expected to grow even more. I can't remember when last I had a laptop work well for 8 years. It seems they're built to be more and more disposable, with batteries not capable of upgrade and such.Most people will either keep running a out of date win10 (assuming M$ does not disable it at some point) or be forced to start using linux.
I think there is something systemically wrong with M$..... could just be death via internal bloat. SO MANY things they do make no sense whatsoever..... like their useless defunct answers site.No the OS should not drive hardware requirements. M$ is hoping that the hardware will cover their inability and unwillingness to make Windows a secure operating environment.
I'm not entirely sure. Laptop sales eclipse desktop sales by a very significant margin and is expected to grow even more. I can't remember when last I had a laptop work well for 8 years. It seems they're built to be more and more disposable, with batteries not capable of upgrade and such.
Stats from a quick Google search says average computer age current is 4 years. 8 year old computers being actively used would be an absolute exception, based on these figures. I guess you represent a fringe case Microsoft finds insignificant enough to not care about.
Partly its because laptops fall apart more easily and partly it's because many people order parts from various places instead of a full PC from one place.I'm not entirely sure. Laptop sales eclipse desktop sales by a very significant margin and is expected to grow even more. I can't remember when last I had a laptop work well for 8 years. It seems they're built to be more and more disposable, with batteries not capable of upgrade and such.
That might be true in the first world.... but I can tell you from experience it's closer to 10-15 in SA outside of the corporate sector. You can throw a figurative rock in any direction and hit multiple people still using 2nd gen machines, the exceptions being the Core2's and D's.Stats from a quick Google search says average computer age current is 4 years. 8 year old computers being actively used would be an absolute exception, based on these figures. I guess you represent a fringe case Microsoft finds insignificant enough to not care about.
Well, they are a business. Last I checked, businesses had a primary goal of making money.M$ only cares about M$
If you replace that chances are you are gonna have to replace the mobo and RAM too..... especially in 4 years.Microsoft making sure the chip shortage is an even bigger mess.
Best affordable replacement for i7-6700K CPU?
K and why would Microsoft care about areas with low hardware sales and probably even less software sales? Why support things you have little opportunity to make profit on?Partly its because laptops fall apart more easily and partly it's because many people order parts from various places instead of a full PC from one place.
And you must have noticed how laptops have become increasingly impossible to repair.
That might be true in the first world.... but I can tell you from experience it's closer to 10-15 in SA outside of the corporate sector. You can throw a figurative rock in any direction and hit multiple people still using 2nd gen machines, the exceptions being the Core2's and D's.
But 1.2 is going to be supported, no?If you replace that chances are you are gonna have to replace the mobo and RAM too..... especially in 4 years.
Like most of us you are going to have to find a compatible TPM chip somewhere.
EDIT: cries in perfectly fine laptop with only TPM 1.2....
So far only 2.0.But 1.2 is going to be supported, no?
The problem is they are clearly over-shooting optimal target machines. Even in the first world people are starting to keep older hardware for longer as their economic situations are worsening.K and why would Microsoft care about areas with low hardware sales and probably even less software sales? Why support things you have little opportunity to make profit on?
Glutton for punishment? That OS was patched to be terrible towards the end..... and it's wide open to virusses.I still use Win7 at home![]()
That might be true in the first world.... but I can tell you from experience it's closer to 10-15 in SA outside of the corporate sector. You can throw a figurative rock in any direction and hit multiple people still using 2nd gen machines, the exceptions being the Core2's and D's.
I'm sure they have access to very accurate stats, more so than anyone else. There is no way they don't know exactly how many actively used machines will be compatible with Windows 11.The problem is they are clearly over-shooting optimal target machines. Even in the first world people are starting to keep older hardware for longer as their economic situations are worsening.