And I am asking - what in this particular rape meant she asked for it ? I am unable to see what you saw in the rape mentioned in the OP.I (twice) explained what I meant by/with/using the expression "asking" for it.
Where did I suggest/imply that she "asked" to be raped in this particular instance?
If a woman isn't "into it" then it is rape. Plain and simple. She must be a willing participant. One who is saying that it hurts - definitely is not enjoying it. Sex is meant to be enjoyable for everyone involved. Not just the man.
You clearly didn't read the OP or any material related to the incident.
Good god. So from implying she contributed to her own rape, you are now heading towards the zone of there was no rape at all?
There is a very high chance that Ponderer raped a person before which is why he is defending the position so vehemently.
It's staged. That's what he's trying to say.There is a very high chance that Ponderer raped a person before which is why he is defending the position so vehemently.
It hasn't been confirmed yet that he hasn't - but is it a fact?
How do we know that Ponderer is truthful about his intentions here?
How can someone(Ponderer) who has access to the voice clip not hear the attacker talking and responding to the woman's pleas? We can only assume that he is intentionally being ignorant because he is pro-rape and has no other grounds to defend it