Tabea Kabinde, Commission for Employment Equity chairperson, speaks with poison tongue.
Much hangs on what exactly "reserved" means. It's a deliberately equivocal construction.
In the context of race and employment in SA it very quickly raises the spectre of 'job reservation', the apartheid system where certain types of jobs were by law reserved to whites or people of legally privileged race groups (eg the Cape Province was a "Coloured preferential employment area").
The root of that unjust system was that these race-based employment inequalities were enshrined in the law. Though the professions and most jobs were never legally restricted in apartheid South Africa (otherwise Tambo and Mandela, for example, could not have been attorneys in private practice, which they were), the race-based reservation of separate amenities laws, race-based land ownership laws, race-based state schooling laws (private schools could admit Blacks, and Catholic ones did), and race-based marriage and residential laws meant that a large and far-reaching structure of racial discrimination was imposed by force of law on all the people of SA.
This was manifestly unjust, and SA's system of legally imposed racial discrimination rightly incurred the opprobrium of the civilised world.
So, when Tabea Kabinde and the CEE say that top privileges are "still reserved" to Whites, what exactly does she mean?
Starting in 1990, not a single race-based law in SA was being enforced, and by mid-1993 the entire corpus of race-based laws in SA had been scrapped and abolished from the statue books. It's what made the open elections in 1994 legally possible.
So what exactly does the chairperson of the Commission for Employment Equity mean by "reserved".
She seems to forget that it was her government that reintroduced race-based laws in South Africa. One wonders when she will see the elephant in the room.
In the meantime, the way she uses "reserved" is equivocal, reckless, and perhaps even inflammatory.