You know Iraq is in trouble...

Alan

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
62,475
Um how about the weapons inspectors? Or the Atomic Energy Commission?

How can anybody argue there is no WMD when the "falsely created intel" reports state otherwise?

When GB is telling everybody they are traitors?

When 'the authorities' are pretending to find bombs everywhere?

You've been had. We were had. We expected to be told the truth. They lied. And who is the biggest liar of all?

Hmmm nope I don't see anybody being quoted :confused:
 

kilo39

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2005
Messages
5,425
Hmmm nope I don't see anybody being quoted :confused:
I've said it before and now I say it again. You really need to learn to use a search engine. And check. Before you make totally stupid statements. And I am tired of doing your work for you so next I will just say "no, wrong" take that as a hint to find the truth.

No WMD in Iraq, source claims
Wednesday, 24 September, 2003

Number 10 will not comment on the report
No weapons of mass destruction have been found in Iraq by the group looking for them, according to a Bush administration source who has spoken to the BBC.
This will be the conclusion of the Iraq Survey Group's interim report, the source told the presenter of BBC television's Daily Politics show, Andrew Neil.

Downing Street branded the story "speculation about an unfinished draft of an interim report".



But why not get it directly from the source: note the lies and doublespeak:

There's a long record here of being wrong. There's a good reason for it. There are probably multiple reasons. Certainly proliferation is a hard thing to track, particularly in countries that deny easy and free access and don't have free and open societies.
Transcript: David Kay at Senate hearing
Thursday, January 29, 2004


Google search: "weapon inspectors find no wmd"

First result.

Wake up.
 

NewsFlash

Banned
Joined
Dec 8, 2006
Messages
584
I've said it before and now I say it again. You really need to learn to use a search engine. And check. Before you make totally stupid statements. And I am tired of doing your work for you so next I will just say "no, wrong" take that as a hint to find the truth.

Wake up.

Whos truth.
"Truth is in the eye of the beholder" By papa Levinsky. (I cannot find a source of this paraphrase on the net)
So Kilo39 everything on the net you eat for sweet cake?
 

kilo39

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2005
Messages
5,425
Whos truth.
"Truth is in the eye of the beholder" By papa Levinsky. (I cannot find a source of this paraphrase on the net)
So Kilo39 everything on the net you eat for sweet cake?
OMG. The authority quoted in this case is the leader of the inspectors (or the investgating committee) set up by GB. He is the Top Dog.

Idiot.
 

NewsFlash

Banned
Joined
Dec 8, 2006
Messages
584
OMG. The authority quoted in this case is the leader of the inspectors (or the investgating committee) set up by GB. He is the Top Dog.

Idiot.

Hi twin brother kilo39, I am refering to all your anti American rhetorics and sources on this forum. Not the only one source you refer too. Primate Idiot no2
 

Alan

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
62,475
I've said it before and now I say it again. You really need to learn to use a search engine. And check. Before you make totally stupid statements. And I am tired of doing your work for you so next I will just say "no, wrong" take that as a hint to find the truth.

No WMD in Iraq, source claims
Wednesday, 24 September, 2003

Number 10 will not comment on the report
No weapons of mass destruction have been found in Iraq by the group looking for them, according to a Bush administration source who has spoken to the BBC.
This will be the conclusion of the Iraq Survey Group's interim report, the source told the presenter of BBC television's Daily Politics show, Andrew Neil.

Downing Street branded the story "speculation about an unfinished draft of an interim report".



But why not get it directly from the source: note the lies and doublespeak:

There's a long record here of being wrong. There's a good reason for it. There are probably multiple reasons. Certainly proliferation is a hard thing to track, particularly in countries that deny easy and free access and don't have free and open societies.
Transcript: David Kay at Senate hearing
Thursday, January 29, 2004


Google search: "weapon inspectors find no wmd"

First result.

Wake up.


I thought that since DragonLogos was so well versed in all things anti-Bush he would have some quotes of someone saying Iraq had no WND pre March 2003. He went through all that trouble to post all those quotes I'm sure he wouldn't mind aiding his arqument by replying to my request.

You can do what you like. Somehow I don't think you would settle for replying "no, wrong".

I must apologise. I mislead you when I said 2003. What I should have said was March 2003 (ie:pre war)

I'm tired today. It was to hot to go to bed at a reasonable hour last night hence the mistake above.
 

kilo39

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2005
Messages
5,425
Hi twin brother kilo39, I am refering to all your anti American rhetorics and sources on this forum. Not the only one source you refer too. Primate Idiot no2
I am not anti-american. I love the americans and america. It is for these reasons I have my stance: I am anti-right wing bigots: liars who misrepresent the truth for their own ends. They LIE. These are not the americans I would want in an american government or running the world.

Look at the mess. Who is to blame? Not america. The government of america. And who be they?
 

kilo39

Executive Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2005
Messages
5,425
I thought that since DragonLogos was so well versed in all things anti-Bush he would have some quotes of someone saying Iraq had no WND pre March 2003. He went through all that trouble to post all those quotes I'm sure he wouldn't mind aiding his arqument by replying to my request.

You can do what you like. Somehow I don't think you would settle for replying "no, wrong".

I must apologise. I mislead you when I said 2003. What I should have said was March 2003 (ie:pre war)

I'm tired today. It was to hot to go to bed at a reasonable hour last night hence the mistake above.
The inspectors were thrown out of Iraq. Why? Because they found nothing and Iraq was sick of being told they had something they didn't.

This continued right up to the start of the war. When lo and behold: they had nothing.

Now who lied?

//and killed probably in excess of a million people including 3000+ american troops.

(lambs to the slaughter based on lies. for the advancement of halliburton and x number of other companies with right-wing bigot ties.)
 
Last edited:

DragonLogos

Expert Member
Joined
May 2, 2005
Messages
2,033
I thought that since DragonLogos was so well versed in all things anti-Bush he would have some quotes of someone saying Iraq had no WND pre March 2003. He went through all that trouble to post all those quotes I'm sure he wouldn't mind aiding his arqument by replying to my request.

You are joking right?
 
Top