- Joined
- Jul 22, 2003
- Messages
- 66,740
What rubbisb! How sad. That old man is still going off on a tangent to extremes which are now even above his comprehension.
His "advisers" surely pocketed some more bags of mielies for that law.
![]()
We forget that a similar law was passed right here in good old S.A about a year ago
There are vast differences between [-]sniffing at random[/-] dedicated, intrusive surveillance and having just cause backed by a warrant (dubious as it is here.) It is illegal in the states (no matter the wishes of George Bush.)no different to being in the states....
There are vast differences between [-]sniffing at random[/-] dedicated, intrusive surveillance and having just cause backed by a warrant (dubious as it is here.) It is illegal in the states (no matter the wishes of George Bush.)
We would like to believe we at least have a smidgen of privacy.
Ditto 4096bit encryptionWe forget that a similar law was passed right here in good old S.A about a year ago, it seems that Bob took hi queue from us this time. the law here now also makes it illegal to use *any* kind of encryption... that's why every drive, message and MMS application I use has encryption on it.