Zuckerberg Responds to Claims That Facebook Prioritizes Profit as ‘Just Not True’

[rpm]

Zuckerberg Responds to Claims That Facebook Prioritizes Profit as ‘Just Not True’

Facebook Inc. Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg addressed a recent series of negative stories about the company for the first time by saying accusations that it puts profit over user safety are “just not true.”

 

[Charlesjjm]

Well if Mark says so, then it must be true.

 

[Jet-Fighter7700]

sure and Pigs fly (ask the Rabbi) and Zuma is "deathly I'll" and Water is been known to be wet.

 

[NeonNinja]

Right...

 

[ShaunSA]

I believe you Mark

 

[JustSomeGuy21]

says the Lizzard..... :-D

 

[My_King]

Facebook Inc. Chief Executive Fact Checker Mark Zuckerberg

Fixed

 

[Takkies]

Zuckerberg Responds to Claims That Facebook Prioritizes Profit as ‘Just Not True’

Facebook Inc. Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg addressed a recent series of negative stories about the company for the first time by saying accusations that it puts profit over user safety are “just not true.”

Suckerberg, society's benefactor, the ultimate altruist.

 

[boobza]

Is prioritizing profit a bad thing now? I thought we were pro-Capitalism.

 

[rietrot]

Is prioritizing profit a bad thing now? I thought we were pro-Capitalism.

Mark is still confused about that.

 

[Kodi]

From the guy that profiteered by deceptively appropriated intellectual property belonging to his peers........Jaaaaa Boet, we believe you!!!

 

[s0lar]

Is prioritizing profit a bad thing now? I thought we were pro-Capitalism.

Hear, hear! Profit uber alles!

 

[SlinkyMike]

What a stupid comment. This is how "dumb fscks" he thinks we are: he is legally beholden to his shareholders to prioritise profit. That's how capitalism works. Anything else is malfeasance.

EDIT: not quite accurate on my part https://mybroadband.co.za/forum/thr...ofit-as-‘just-not-true’.1157146/post-28146332

 

[Kodi]

Is prioritizing profit a bad thing now? I thought we were pro-Capitalism.

In principle, we too could capitalise $millions by opening up a prepubescent whore house.

 

[Mekon]

Of course the pasty cretin would say that. I hope recent revelations does him some harm.

 

[ShaunSA]

Is prioritizing profit a bad thing now? I thought we were pro-Capitalism.

Methinks this is a tad higher grade for you

 

[C4Cat]

What a stupid comment. This is how "dumb fscks" he thinks we are: he is legally beholden to his shareholders to prioritise profit. That's how capitalism works. Anything else is malfeasance.

He is not legally beholden to prioritise profit over everything else. Profit needs to be a priority, of course, but so is safety of users. When profit is priotised over user safety, or other concerns, in other businesses, it is seen as a problem, why should this be any different?

 

[The Voice]

If you're not paying to use the product, you ARE the product.

There was no reason for FB to ever buy WhatsApp and IG other than to get more of our info to sell to 3rd parties.

 

[C4Cat]

Is prioritizing profit a bad thing now? I thought we were pro-Capitalism.

Mark only has a net worth of 122,7 billion USD. Clearly he's not making enough money yet

 

[boobza]

In principle, we too could capitalise $millions by opening up a prepubescent whore house.

In principle, no.
Mark Zuckerberg and FB aren’t responsible for your children, you are.

“Instagram gave my child mental health issues”. Snowflakes.