TheChamp
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2011
- Messages
- 57,511
Name and shame people for doing their jobs? That's a new one...Trashy lawyers always defending trash.
We need to name and shame more of these bottom feeders.
Name and shame people for doing their jobs? That's a new one...Trashy lawyers always defending trash.
We need to name and shame more of these bottom feeders.
So all criminal lawyers should be named and shamed? No need, just have a look at the websites of law firms handling criminal matters - they name and shame themselves there. ROFL.Trashy lawyers always defending trash.
We need to name and shame more of these bottom feeders.
But can you for instance say no, you do not want to represent a certain individual?
I know nothing about Bar rules etc so my comment was more along the line of "we dont care who we represent, as long as we get our money".
That is very interesting and something I never knew. My apologies to the 2 gentleman and sorry that that useless thing decided you should represent it.You cannot say no unless it’s for a valid reason (such as no capacity or if they haven’t paid you in the past...). This is to ensure that advocates don’t pick and choose briefs that suit them, at the expense of people who need help
So you don't want people to have the right to a fair trial?Trashy lawyers always defending trash.
We need to name and shame more of these bottom feeders.
That is very interesting and something I never knew. My apologies to the 2 gentleman and sorry that that useless thing decided you should represent it.
2.1 Duty to Accept Briefs
Counsel is under an obligation to accept a brief in the Courts in which
he professes to practise, at a proper professional fee, unless there are
special circumstances which justify his refusal to accept a particular
brief. In particular, every person who is charged before the Court has a
right to services of counsel in the presentation of his defence. Subject
to what has been said above, it is the duty of every advocate to whom
the privilege of practising in Courts of Law is afforded, to undertake the
defence of an accused person who requires his services. Any action
which is designed to interfere with the performance of this duty is an
interference with the course of justice.
Thank youI found the rule from the General Council of the Bar of South Africa -