MyBroadband tested the power draw of incandescent, fluorescent, and LED light bulbs, and the results were in line with what the manufacturers promised on the box.
Modern LED lightbulbs promise bright light at a fraction of the power draw compared to older CFL and incandescent bulbs.
Old incandescent bulbs were commonly available with power ratings of 40W to 100W. Because of their high power draw, they are no longer widely used for illumination.
Incandescent bulbs were replaced with compact fluorescent (CFL) bulbs that need significantly less power and have a longer life.
CFL bulbs are commonly available with power ratings around 10W to 30W, yet still provide brightness on par with their incandescent counterparts.
Although CFL bulbs are far more efficient than incandescent bulbs, they are no match for LED bulbs which are now becoming the standard.
LED bulbs offer the same brightness as CFL bulbs but require far less power — between 3W to 15W.
LED bulbs also last much longer — 25,000 hours compared with 10,000 hours for CFL bulbs and 1,000 hours for incandescent bulbs.
These figures are all based on manufacturer claims, and to ensure we are not misled, MyBroadband decided to test the power consumption of different bulbs.
We tested different incandescent, fluorescent, and LED light bulbs with a PZEM-004T based monitoring system to see how they compare with the rated values.
The measurement module measures AC voltage, current, real power, frequency, and power factor with an accuracy of better than 1%.
We started with incandescent bulbs and found that they drew up to 17% less power than advertised.
It is easy to explain the lower power consumption. These bulbs are rated at 230V, 240V and 250V, while the actual voltage on the grid was closer to 220V at the time of testing.
These bulbs have no fancy circuitry to manage power draw and rely on Ohm’s law as they use a simple resistive element. Thus, as the voltage goes down, the current and power draw also decline.
The resistive nature of these bulbs was also confirmed by the perfect power factor of 1, indicating no capacitive or inductive components.
Although it took some time to settle at a constant draw, the CFL bulbs were closer to the advertised power draw.
The CFL bulbs make use of rectifying circuits inside, which means they change the current waveform relative to the voltage waveform, causing a drop in power factor.
Consumers generally only pay for real power consumed, ignoring this inefficiency, but this may play a role in some commercial setups.
The CFL bulbs’ power draw ranged between 4% more and 6% less than the advertised values.
The LED bulbs that were tested were the closest to their advertised values, drawing 2% and 3% more power than expected.
The LED bulbs make use of a lot of circuitry inside, causing a similar power factor to the CFL bulbs.
Judging by a simple side-by-side comparison and published brightness values for different bulbs related to power draw, LED is the way to go.
The table below provides an overview of the light bulb power draw test results.
|Lightbulb Power Draw|
||Type||Rated Power (W)||Actual Power (W)||Difference||Power Factor||Rated Luminous flux|
|PnP Compact Energy Saver||CFL||14||14.6||4%||0.64||750 lm|
|PnP 9W LED T-lamp||LED||9||9.3||3%||0.62||765 lm|
|PnP 5W LED T-lamp||LED||5||5.1||2%||0.63||420 lm|
|Osram Energy Saver||CFL||14||13.8||-1%||0.64||810 lm|
|PnP 18W BC||CFL||18||17||-6%||0.65||990 lm|
|Philips 40W Candle||Incandescent||40||37.5||-6%||1||400 lm|
|Generic 100W Incandescent||Incandescent||100||86.8||-13%||1||1200 lm|
|Tungsram 40W Spherical||Incandescent||40||33.3||-17%||1||400 lm|