{"id":552250,"date":"2007-05-12T00:29:40","date_gmt":"2007-05-12T00:29:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost:8888\/wordpress\/technology\/552250-watchdog-sniffs-telkom-prices.html"},"modified":"2007-05-12T00:29:40","modified_gmt":"2007-05-12T00:29:40","slug":"watchdog-sniffs-telkom-prices","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mybroadband.co.za\/news\/technology\/552250-watchdog-sniffs-telkom-prices.html","title":{"rendered":"Watchdog sniffs Telkom prices"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><font size=\"2\">Telkom charges business clients R132 a month for the rental of an ordinary business line. For exactly the same line, technologically speaking, it charges R99 for residential customers. The difference of R33 a month won\u2019t be enough to make ay business owner take the case to the Competition Commission, but if Telkom services, say, 500 000 business lines, is it possibly skimming off as much as R16,5-million a month from the South African business community in contravention of the Competition Act?<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font size=\"2\">Telkom\u2019s business centre, where orders for new lines are placed, confirmed that a business registered as a Close Corporation will not be able to order a residential line. The operator was willing, however, to register a residential line as long as the business owner put it under his own name, as opposed to that of the business.<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font size=\"2\">Two years ago, the Cape Chamber complained to the Competition Commission on behalf of business owner Marius Marais that Telkom was forcing business owners to buy their faster and more expensive business internet broadband package. Businesses were prohibited from renting the slower but cheaper residential ADSL offering.<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font size=\"2\">While the investigation dragged on at the commission, Telkom scrapped the difference between their residential and business ADSL packages. At the time, it denied that it was in response to the investigation. It said it was done to simplify the company\u2019s ADSL range.<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font size=\"2\">Keith Weeks, senior economic analyst at the commission, believes that the pressure of the investigation had at least something to do with changes in Telkom\u2019s product offering.<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font size=\"2\">Commenting on the possibility that a similar case could be made that Telkom\u2019s differentiation between residential and business telephone lines is anti-competitive, Weeks said he \u201cwouldn\u2019t say no\u201d, but that a careful investigation would have to be made of the difference between the two offerings.<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font size=\"2\">He was aware of the fact that Telkom argued that business customers enjoy priority when it comes to fixing faulty lines and that this was supposed to be the basis of the price difference. During the ADSL investigation they had asked Telkom to provide evidence of the priority, but it was never received.<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font size=\"2\">Most lawyers approached for comment said that a successful case of price discrimination, where a dominant company charges different customers different prices for the same service, is very hard to make, because the law requires proof that the practice leads to a \u201csubstantial lessening of competition\u201d.<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font size=\"2\">A few years ago, owner-manager Jim Foot lost a lengthy legal process against chemical giant Sasol. Foot had proved, by obtaining official Sasol price lists that he was paying substantially more for creosote \u2013 the chemical used to treat tar poles \u2013 than his larger competitors. He eventually lost the case because he could not prove that the price discrimination practiced by Sasol substantially lessened competition in his industry.<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font size=\"2\">But one commentator said that in the recent Mittal Steel case, the Competition Tribunal found that Mittal\u2019s ability to \u201cstratify the market, segment the market and charge different segments of the market different prices\u201d, signaled to the tribunal that excessive pricing was being practiced. A similar argument could be made for Telkom\u2019s segmentation of residential and business line rentals.<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font size=\"2\">But competition lawyer Nkonzo Hlatshwayo of Webber Wentzel Bowens said not everyone is sure \u201cwhether the tribunal got it right\u201d\u2019 and that the Competition Appeal Court may overturn the ruling.<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font size=\"2\">Telkom spokesperson Khulani Qomaka said Telkom would not divulge the number of its business line customers, as this is commercially confidential information. Nor could it comment on any possible changes to its products and services, as the company was trading in a \u201cclosed period\u201d just before the release of its financial results. It would respond in writing about accusations that it was profiteering, he said. At the time of filing, no response had been received.<\/font><\/p>\n<p><font size=\"2\"><a href=\"http:\/\/mybroadband.co.za\/vb\/showthread.php?t=75003\">Comments<\/a><\/font><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mg.co.za\/\">Mail &amp; Guardian<\/a><\/p>\n<p \/>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the wake of recent developments at the competition authorities, which have so far caused more disappointment than relief for small businesses, an intriguing possibility emerges that an age-old and basic practice by Telkom may well be anti-competitive.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":23,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_sma_x_autopost_status":"idle","_sma_x_autopost_error":"","_sma_x_post_id":"","_sma_facebook_post_id":"","_sma_instagram_post_id":"","_sma_threads_post_id":"","_sma_x_attempts":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-552250","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-technology"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mybroadband.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/552250"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mybroadband.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mybroadband.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mybroadband.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/23"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mybroadband.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=552250"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mybroadband.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/552250\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mybroadband.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=552250"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mybroadband.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=552250"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mybroadband.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=552250"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}