Join us now. It is free, and it takes less than 1 minute to register.
Register now
Subscribe to our daily newsletter. It is free, and it comes with many benefits.


+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Man wins right to sue Google for defamation over image search results

  1. #1
    MyBB Legend
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    /\/¯¯¯¯¯\/\
    Posts
    36,933
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Man wins right to sue Google for defamation over image search results

    Man wins right to sue Google for defamation over image search results


    Melbourne man Milorad “Michael” Trkulja has won his high court battle to sue the search engine Google for defamation over images and search results that link him to the Melbourne criminal underworld.

    Trkulja said he would continue legal action against Google until it removed his name and photos from the internet.

    Trkulja, who was shot in the back in a Melbourne restaurant in 2004, successfully argued in the Victorian supreme court in 2012 that Google defamed him by publishing photos of him linked to hardened criminals of Melbourne’s underworld.

    Four years later the Victorian court of appeal overturned the decision, finding the case had no prospect of successfully proving defamation.

    The high court disputed that ruling in a judgment on Wednesday and ordered Google to pay Trkulja’s legal costs.

    Trkulja said he would continue the legal action until he got the result he wanted.

    “I will sue Google … and I will sue them til they stop. I want them to block my pictures,” he said. “I’m not a criminal, I’ve never been involved and I will make sure these people are not going to ruin my family – I have grandchildren.”

    Google searches for “Melbourne criminal underworld photos” bring up images of Trkulja alongside gangland figures Mick Gatto, Carl Williams, Chopper Reid, Mario Condello and Mark and Jason Moran, Trkulja’s lawyer Guy Reynolds told the high court in March.

    However, Google’s lawyers argued it would be “irrational” for someone to assume photos in a Google image search for underworld figures all showed criminals, because the same search would also bring up the Google logo, movie posters, images of crime victims and photos of actor Marlon Brando.

    In a unanimous judgment led by the chief justice, Susan Keifel, the court said it was to be assumed someone searching for members of the Melbourne criminal underworld would “rationally suppose” the people whose pictures or names appeared, or at least some of them, were members of such.

    The court found while it was clear some of those pictured, such as Brando, were not criminals, it could be concluded someone who was relatively unknown, such as Trkulja, could be connected with criminality or the underworld.

    Trkulja also claimed defamation around Google’s “autocomplete” options for his name, which have included phrases like “is a former hit man”, “criminal” and “underworld”.

    However, the court heard autocomplete was an automated function and that previous searches influenced future suggestions.

    Comment is being sought from Google.


  2. #2
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3,150
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Barbara Streisand effect in 3... 2... 1...

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. CTR performance on Google Search results.
    By Auto Start in forum Software and Web Development
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-12-2017, 06:05 PM
  2. Google image search gets badges to categorise results
    By Newsfeed in forum Broadband and IT News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-08-2017, 07:40 PM
  3. Google refines search results
    By rpm in forum Broadband and IT News
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-10-2009, 12:48 AM
  4. Google wins search battle
    By rpm in forum Broadband and IT News
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-07-2007, 10:09 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •