Recent content by 00DEZZ

Andrew has written excellent articles in the past. He messed this one up completely because the content with regards to recent happenings is NOT within his sphere of knowledge. He is probably getting the info from lackies on site and felt pressured to say something. Everything else in the...

What loose bolt. Make sure before you make a fool of yourself.

I would even go as far as saying that the person that wrote the section in the Shutdown Times was out of context on some statements. The person was clearly frustrated. Such speech should be reserved for a face to face dress down where the people you address can correct you.

Andrew states many obvious facts. Then he states just plain lies. I cannot divulge specific details except that this should have never been a huge public concern and that he got numbers wrong on SG's delivered as well as the status of the building to house the old SG's. Completely wrong.

That 3rd page article in one of the newspapers clearly said that after forensics was performed various material residues were found that are consistent with the components within the generator. There was a short. The above article prove that there was no sabotage involved. The real reasons for...

Context is everything. When you are an expert you understand the context of the above writing in the Shutdown Times. Imagine the SA government spoke as sternly to themselves at every corner. This was an event that is irrelevant to the public. Someone on site that is not an expert thought it...

There was no loose bolt. People just read the sensation and not the 3rd page article that come out much later to prove that there was no bolt incident.

I have respected many of the Articles and opinions Andrew has given in the past. In this article he states many facts. He also makes factual errors as he is not a part of the Nuclear industry in SA and get information from people that are clearly not experts. Andrew you are embarrassing...