Why don't you go and read the SARB Position Paper on Virtual Currencies, specifically but not limited to article 3.2.4, and then you may actually start to sound like you know what you're talking about instead of like a rebellious teen with a default contrarian attitude?
Stop wasting my time.
That's one hell of a way to compare apples to pears. What I do with my money has nothing to do with you or the government or anybody else. It's not like using a public road where I can endanger you. My rights end where yours begin (and vice versa), in accordance with natural law. So I can't...
What a joke. Why couldn't MTI get a license for using ZAR, yet it could use BTC? Because our moronic government chose not to recognise crypto as money.
Well done government, you failed your people (again), in your attempt to discredit the future of global finance. You GENIUSES!
P. S. Stupid...
This article was linked to in another.
Regulation, what for? Are you a tyrant who likes to tell people what they may or may not do with their own money?
It's obvious that Topham's knowledge about the governance and security of cryptocurrencies is practically zero. Where is his license to regulate that which he does not understand?
Ludicrous that the blind get to lead the rest, that's one hell of a way to let your country miss out on the most...
Bitcoin is the antithesis of greed! Perhaps you've forgotten its raison d'etre gforever encoded into the genesis block. You want greed, look at fiat.
Of course "that's not how the world works", which is precisely why we now have bitcoin! It works differently - and that's the point. Adoption...
MTI name drop.
Cute attempt at character assassination though association, but also a glaring logical fallacy.
I'm not all knowing, I just know more than you do.