Can someone explain why he’s become the face of DEI? Were his qualifications (assuming they were real as the people hiring him thought they were) not good enough to get him the position? Or is any person of colour in a high position considered DEI now?
His original “physical and mental benefits” were debunked so he pivoted to benefits such as it creating employment.
Anyway, subsequently it was revealed that he’s both an alcoholic as well as directly linked to and benefitting from the alcohol industry so no one really takes his views on the...