controversial take in these parts. Lets see how this pans out.
Most people on this forum don't understand how progression works and would rather be stuck on 4Mbps ADSL as opposed to fibre
keep in mind that there is a duty cycle limit. So at some stage if people start to use it to discuss Piet and his dog howling at the moon at 12AM you might get close to the dusty cycle limits
Leo will have a customer base in South Africa while Elon is trying to make an example out of South Africa.
Don't have to be an economist to know that being able to offer your services in a country already beats a service that isn't available. Doesn't matter if Leo is a joke compared to...
To be frank, everyone should be behind CGNAT unless they need access to do port forwarding.
At the end of the day, how many compromised routers are there out there with the classic admin/admin credentials that is just accessible via the internet?
Is there any benefit to giving mobile devices IPv6 addresses anyway? CGNAT works. Customers don't care if they use IPv4 or IPv6. 99.99% of customers just want to be able to watch a video, maybe make a WhatsApp call. No one really cares about what is used as long as they can do what they want to.