My statement is prescriptive, not descriptive.
It is meant to stand apart from the facts. As a reference, to aid in the interpretation of the facts.
As are all moral position statements.
Yeeeeeyaaaaaa......that's what I'm getting at.
Detached, and indifferent from having to make sense of the world around you, and from drawing meaning from history and language.
Cynics-101.
At least you're not pretending to be interested.
Yes.
The premise of the supposed 'moral imbecile' has never been proven.
We're still waiting after all this time.
Well, it depends how you define 'mind'.
Pinko's usually conflate it with 'brain,' so they typically think 'guilty brain'.
It's called blaming the brain for moral acts.
Mind...
Sorry, if you are competent enough to commit the crime, you are competent enough to be punished for it.
Minors excepted.
The fact his guardian took so long to provide his age.... hmmm who is that on, justifiably?
New thread on PCR inventor Karry Mullis' view on the use/misuse of PCR...
https://mybroadband.co.za/forum/threads/karry-mullis-pcr-inventor-what-did-he-say-about-the-use-misuse-of-pcr.1348098/#post-34587986
It seems like he's making amends towards Ashley's situation.
She (apparently)opened/signed for more than one package so, sounds like she knew what she was doing.
And it doesn't sound to me like it makes any sense for him to turn himself in to the Thai authorities.... they'll just prosecute...
Brian_G just start a new thread : 'Karry Mullis's claims re: HIV/AIDS and PCR," in the Convid section.
Then we can discuss it without risking shutting this thread down.
If what we discover is relevant, we can mention it again on this thread, as far as it pertains to JWs and blood...