That’s a spectacular rant about everything except the actual article... but I suppose the haters were always going to come crawling out of the woodwork again. 😂
Okay, now THAT actually answers the question I was asking.
Randomly selecting ordinary citizens to serve for limited periods instead of creating a permanent political class is at least a practical alternative system I can get my head around.
Whether I'd trust it to run a modern country is...
And there we have it. 😂
Asked for evidence... F*KK*L... couldn't provide any... F*KK*L... “pedo lover” rinse and repeat.
That's not an argument, Bob. That's a tantrum with a keyboard.
But yes, ignoring me is probably your best option. Then you won't have to answer the question.
Fair enough, then I misunderstood what you meant by “moral superiority”. I'll give you that one. 👍
Doesn't change the actual point we're debating though. 😂
And now Mandela has entered the chat. 😂
What Mandela may or may not have intended has F*KK*L to do with the question I asked you.
You said Article 1 gives an individual the unilateral legal right to leave the political union.
Show me where it says that... I'll wait...
Not your interpretation...
I didn't say you advocated “no rules”. I said freedom comes with rules and consequences. There's a difference.
You've spent half this discussion telling me people should be free to leave political unions and choose which rules they associate under. I'm asking where the limits are and who...