Recent content by talanum1

  1. talanum1

    I can Prove Neutrons don't Decay by Quarks Transforming.

    As for the interaction happening at a single vertex: Feynmann diagrams are drawn with space on on axis and time on another, so we have an interaction that requires 1/infinity in both time and space. Since infinity is non-physical the Feynmann diagram is wrong! At the vertex you have to have...
  2. talanum1

    I can Prove Neutrons don't Decay by Quarks Transforming.

    No, but I believe space thinks.
  3. talanum1

    I can Prove Neutrons don't Decay by Quarks Transforming.

    One billiard ball colliding with another is a physical calculation. Same with an object reacting to a field.
  4. talanum1

    I can Prove Neutrons don't Decay by Quarks Transforming.

    I need a South African organization name not American.
  5. talanum1

    I can Prove Neutrons don't Decay by Quarks Transforming.

    What good would that do: I can't remember any of the happenings in the abductions. It does: how else is Nature to come to a decision to allow an interaction or not? If you say objects just responds to space and fields: that is still a computation.
  6. talanum1

    I can Prove Neutrons don't Decay by Quarks Transforming.

    How does Nature mimic computation then?
  7. talanum1

    I can Prove Neutrons don't Decay by Quarks Transforming.

    I'm claiming it is natural telepathy and real Aliens!
  8. talanum1

    I can Prove Neutrons don't Decay by Quarks Transforming.

    Saying it doesn't exist because you can't explain it is like sweeping the dirt under the carpet.
  9. talanum1

    I can Prove Neutrons don't Decay by Quarks Transforming.

    Of course it computes: particles with one set of momenta don't transform while the same type of particles with a different set of momenta does. This happens continuously.
  10. talanum1

    I can Prove Neutrons don't Decay by Quarks Transforming.

    Anyway, you can't explain how the computation happens, yet you are obliged to do computations to predict outcomes!
  11. talanum1

    I can Prove Neutrons don't Decay by Quarks Transforming.

    Nature can calculate fast but not instantaneously: how would that work? Even if the computation is hardwired into space, because it must be encoded generally, it must take time. Specify any calculation and I can guarantee you it takes time to execute: at the very least a number must be read into...
  12. talanum1

    I can Prove Neutrons don't Decay by Quarks Transforming.

    Our conceptual Universe changes from a Transformer Universe to a more behaved Universe. More elegance.
  13. talanum1

    I can Prove Neutrons don't Decay by Quarks Transforming.

    You can't explain how the quark structure changes. I can explain the transformation in detail.
  14. talanum1

    I can Prove Neutrons don't Decay by Quarks Transforming.

    Cancelling of the electron neutrino on both sides is not essential for the argument and can be left out.
  15. talanum1

    I can Prove Neutrons don't Decay by Quarks Transforming.

    According to you: at a single point in time, Nature has to decide to allow the transformation or not: this is not physically realizable because a computation has to happen and that takes time: so an instant transformation can't happen. I have explained how the computation happens: you can't do...
See more
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X