Recent content by talanum1

  1. talanum1

    I can Prove Neutrons don't Decay by Quarks Transforming.

    "physics stack exchange" deleted my post that ran like this one. It just shows you what some would do to continue blissfully with a wrong idea.
  2. talanum1

    I can Prove Neutrons don't Decay by Quarks Transforming.

    My theory allows us to cause neutron decay, and use the electrons set free for electricity. We will be able to generate a voltage with light!
  3. talanum1

    I can Prove Neutrons don't Decay by Quarks Transforming.

    I can't do it myself: I don't have the equipment or the money.
  4. talanum1

    I can Prove Neutrons don't Decay by Quarks Transforming.

    I can only find a plot of neutron decay rate vs. neutron kinetic energy. I won't accept the empirical data until they actually perform the experiment of bombarding neutrons with 68 MeV/c^2 photons. It's kinetic energy of neutrons, not energy available to produce anti-uu's, unless there are...
  5. talanum1

    Proof of "Axioms" of Propositional Logic.

    I managed to prove another "axiom" of Propositional Logic: We need two more axioms: A:AAS: ( )-->--(B)-->--[] (A) (C)... []-->-- )-->--(B) (D) (E)...) <-> ((B)-->--[] (A) (C)...(D) (E)...) where the Stopper is assumed attached to the second structure "B" and: A:AO ((A)-->--( []-->--...
  6. talanum1

    Debates - Potential Faulty Science

    I write Physics and Mathematics papers and watches YouTube videos.
  7. talanum1

    Debates - Potential Faulty Science

    Problem with the Shell Model for Nuclei: The p-orbitals must be spherically symmetricly placed, so they must be located on the x, y and z axis in which case only 4 of them can orbit. So how is p_1/2 orbitals to display spin-orbit coupling? Only 4 of them can orbit because if the z axis also...
  8. talanum1

    Debates - Potential Faulty Science

    This way obscures my scientific contribution like post #102!
  9. talanum1

    Debates - Potential Faulty Science

    I'm here: I've been told to post all my posts under the same heading!
  10. talanum1

    Debates - Potential Faulty Science

    i can have the value: (1/sqrt(2))(i+j)!
  11. talanum1

    Debates - Potential Faulty Science

    I can Prove there must be Extra Dimensions See attachment: Theorem 3 page 8,
  12. talanum1

    Debates - Potential Faulty Science

    Problem With a Particle Being an Excitation in a Field: A quark is an excitation in the quark field. Then where is the specific quark's momentum recorded?
  13. talanum1

    Why no Left Handed Anti-neutrinos Exist

    Fine thanks. The ZT0 is a new particle I postulate, with just spin = 1 and isospin = 1/2.
  14. talanum1

    Debates - Potential Faulty Science

    There just has to be one value of i^2 = j^2 = k^2 = -1 that doesn't satisfy ijk = -1, to say that the axioms are inconsistent with the rest of mathematics.
  15. talanum1

    Debates - Potential Faulty Science

    I gave them different values and still didn't get ijk = -1: i(i + j)/sqrt(2)(i - j)/sqrt(2) = (i/2)(-1 + 1) = 0 not = -1!
See more
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X