Simphiwe@dwera
Member
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2020
- Messages
- 29
- Reaction score
- 2
It is only now that the sent me occupational rent agreement as it was never mentioned in the sale agreement
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Yes that would be the case if you expressed desire to move in before transfer date. They can be two separate agreements.It is only now that the sent me occupational rent agreement as it was never mentioned in the sale agreement
There was no tenant in place for over 8 months.Indeed. And any existing tenant, were there one in this case (which there isn't as house was vacant) would have occupation as per the rental agreement. "Huur gaat voor Koop" is the legal phrase in SA.
If the seller (such as the deceased's executor in this case) agrees to let the buyer take occupation before transfer, then that's a matter of their Agreement.
It is well established in SA law that all agreements for the sale or hire of land must be in writing. No verbal agreements can be enforced at law.
It is only now that the sent me occupational rent agreement as it was never mentioned in the sale agreement
That has no bearing on sale nor rental agreement.There was no tenant in place for over 8 months.
They only introducing it now after I have taken occupation since last year end sep 2018Had quick look, it does not give explicit right to purchaser to move in before transfer but it also does specifies rental amount as NA which could be interpreted as 0 if access is allowed in written form.
So as I see it they can allow you access only after the transfer.
Did you move in? Is there separate rental agreement?
Again, if no occupational rent is provided for in the AoS then earlier occupation is a matter of separate agreement. If the seller verbally agreed to earlier occupation and the buyer took occupation before she was the registered owner then, absent a written rental agreement, neither party has recourse to the courts to enforce the verbal rental agreement. The legal owner can apply to evict the occupant, subject of course to other laws about squatting and occupation.Yeah fair enough but I mean you can't just assume you can live there for free? You should open a conversation with them and possibly agree to meet somewhere in the middle stating that it would be in the interest of security over the property, it is in their interest that you don't move in frankly as occupation before registration is when you the buyer start finding issues which becomes a problem for them
I did speak to them and I told them that why introduce this now if initially it was not part of the sale agreement, I could have looked for something that is available as I did state that I pressed to move immediately and I am paying cashYeah fair enough but I mean you can't just assume you can live there for free? You should open a conversation with them and possibly agree to meet somewhere in the middle stating that it would be in the interest of security over the property, it is in their interest that you don't move in frankly as occupation before registration is when you the buyer start finding issues which becomes a problem for them
Ok that is interesting, I would say that if you do not have written agreement that you can occupy worst case is that they can kick you out until transfer is done. One for sure is they can not claim previous rent if agreement was not in place.They only introducing it now after I have taken occupation since last year end sep 2018
It is in writing via emailSo they never specified an occupational rent amount, but from what I can see they also never specified an agreed upon occupation date prior to registration, is this specified elsewhere in the agreement?
Delayed was from the seller as she was signing at the wrong place this happened for a month, before December 2019Ok that is interesting, I would say that if you do not have written agreement that you can occupy worst case is that they can kick you out until transfer is done. One for sure is they can not claim previous rent if agreement was not in place.
Who paid for utilities? Were any delays from your side?
They only introducing it now after I have taken occupation since last year end sep 2018
Again, if no occupational rent is provided for in the AoS then earlier occupation is a matter of separate agreement. If the seller verbally agreed to earlier occupation and the buyer took occupation before she was the registered owner then, absent a written rental agreement, neither party has recourse to the courts to enforce the verbal rental agreement. The legal owner can apply to evict the occupant, subject of course to other laws about squatting and occupation.
At best, the owner can invoke his own right to occupy and the tenant should move out until s/he is the owner. In no case can past "rent" be claimed - that's water under the bridge.
If not part of the signed OTP / AoS then other Ts&Cs, correspondence, docs, etc are ignored. That is well established in SA law, for centuries.It is in writing via email
It's pre paid electricity but levies are then paid by the sellerDelayed was from the seller as she was signing at the wrong place this happened for a month, before December 2019
? What attitude? The only small quibble I have with your response above is where you state "you can't just assume you can live there for free?" (why not?) and "You should open a conversation with them and possibly agree to meet somewhere in the middle" (should is too strong; could or can is more accurate). Perhaps a practical way forward, but in strict legal terms no occupational rent is due. Period.We are on the same page so I am not sure why the attitude?
I am not sure who appointed the conveyance. From what I am told is that the bond needs to be serviced but my question was how come as it's a late estate? Then I was told that there's a marriage of in community property it's confusing to meWho appointed the conveyancers and why the delay?