Next Thing
Executive Member
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2005
- Messages
- 7,546
- Reaction score
- 10,203
Boreholes too won't offer much of a premium if they're common. Unlike solar they are also a threat to the resource they exploit if they do become common. Especially near the coast where excessive extraction of underground water can permanently destroy the source.
It's not an investment because it is an expense. Nebulous claims about higher house prices notwithstanding.
You're assuming solar installations don't become common in your area. You must also live somewhere that the city management doesn't use water and electricity as a source of income. Any place where they do they'll be shifting that income to rates, availability charges or something else, but we'll still pay it.
OK so...
Boreholes arent overly common yet, neither is solar. The cost for putting them in hinders the numbers.
I disagree on your comments of Expense versus Investement. But that could just be with the way I see life and convenience.
If I have a choice between a house and theh only difference is green features. Sure as hell I will be willing to pay extra for that. There you go, free market principles.
As far as Municipality charges, I did say a few times about educating yourself on the options available and do some proper sums. Irrespective there will still be savings.



