Alec Baldwin fatally shoots woman with prop gun on movie set

You still sour about that?
Not really. That he's a hero to the extreme right is a bit sad though. Sure - it was declared self defence - agree with that, but if he'd not been such a militant, captured right winger, he'd not have been there in the 1st place.

Anyway - it's not over for him yet.
 
Just throwing some fuel on the flames here:

- Real gun
- Aimed directly at head
- Real live round
- Trigger pulled

It does however state that:
However, in one of Robert De Niro’s most daring requests, he also asked if a live cartridge could be loaded into the revolver used in the Russian roulette scene to heighten the intensity of the dramatic moment. De Niro’s co-star John Cazale agreed to the request though understandably demanded to obsessively check the gun before each and every take to ensure the live round wasn’t next in the chamber.

Still, pretty much all rules of gun safety broken on set. It happens people, gun rules are broken on set - but it's the responsibility of the armorer to ensure that this happens safely.

Doesn't mean actors can't be negligent, actors can be negligent if they do things without the required oversight from the armorer - but the point stands, gun rules are broken all the time on movie sets.

If you want to advocate that they never get broken on set, then that's a different discussion and one which would save lives absolutely. But the reality is that they are broken on set, and someone is appointed specifically to oversee that - an armorer.
 
He has two charges against him. One for his actions as an actor, one for his actions as the producer.
That is not true. He's charged in the alternative for involuntary manslaughter and involuntary manslaughter in the commission of a lawful act. The jury decides, if guilty, either one or the lesser other.
 
You sound like the left woketards now that are calling this a republican campaign against Baldwin, even the prosecutor is republican despite being a lifelong democrat.
Really? Not suggesting this is some kind of plot but if you think politics has nothing to do with the decision to prosecute people in the US then I have a bridge to sell you.

And BTW Andrea Reeb's wiki profile says that she is a Republican

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Reeb

As to the politics of her job, the key is right here...

Reeb was elected district attorney for New Mexico's Ninth Judicial District in 2014 and served until March 2022.[2][3] She was elected to the New Mexico House of Representatives in November 2022 and assumed office on January 1, 2023.[4]

Prosecutors are elected in the states, a lot of what they choose to do and say has political implications.

 
That is not true. He's charged in the alternative for involuntary manslaughter and involuntary manslaughter in the commission of a lawful act. The jury decides, if guilty, either one or the lesser other.
The charges clearly delineate his roles as each one.
 
Really? Not suggesting this is some kind of plot but if you think politics has nothing to do with the decision to prosecute people in the US then I have a bridge to sell you.

And BTW Andrea Reeb's wiki profile says that she is a Republican

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Reeb

As to the politics of her job, the key is right here...



Prosecutors are elected in the states, a lot of what they choose to do and say has political implications.


The prosecutor was appointed by a Democrat DA:
Reeb was appointed as a special prosecutor by Santa Fe County's district attorney Mary Carmack-Altwies


I mean you can just tell the DA is a big time Trump supporter:
We previously discussed how prosecutors in North Carolina, Georgia, Oregon, and other states have dismissed or downgraded many rioting cases, including cases of individuals who destroyed statues in broad daylight. Now, New Mexico District Attorney Mary Carmack-Altwies has announced that all of the individuals who destroyed a 152-year-old obelisk last October will be given “restorative justice” and no jail time. They will however be required to write a letter about their actions. Carmack-Altwies called the premeditated act of destruction of the obelisk a mere “political problem that got forced upon the criminal justice system.”


https://jonathanturley.org/2021/05/...ives-probation-to-all-rioters/comment-page-1/

She is absolutely going to give a nice leaniant plea deal to Baldwin.
 
The charges clearly delineate his roles as each one.
If that is the case, why was the armourer also charged with two counts of involuntary manslaughter, she only held one position? Am fairly certain the charges relate two possible different kinds of manslaughter, not Alec Baldwin's roles on the film.
 
If that is the case, why was the armourer also charged with two counts of involuntary manslaughter, she only held one position? Am fairly certain the charges relate two possible different kinds of manslaughter, not Alec Baldwin's roles on the film.
They do, but their culpability does depend on the roles they played.

I am just quoting the prosecutor on this, they wouldn't set out the charge sheet like that if they were planning on presenting something similar to the jury to simplify it.
 
They do, but their culpability does depend on the roles they played.

I am just quoting the prosecutor on this, they wouldn't set out the charge sheet like that if they were planning on presenting something similar to the jury to simplify it.
It just seems weird that if they thought the producers should be charged for failing in their duties, why were none of the other producers charged?
 
The charges clearly delineate his roles as each one.
No they do not. One is involuntary manslaughter as a result of an unlawful act the the alternative is as a result of a lawful act. Unlawful means it was done without lawful justification or excuse.
 
Really? Not suggesting this is some kind of plot but if you think politics has nothing to do with the decision to prosecute people in the US then I have a bridge to sell you.

And BTW Andrea Reeb's wiki profile says that she is a Republican

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Reeb

As to the politics of her job, the key is right here...



Prosecutors are elected in the states, a lot of what they choose to do and say has political implications.


Who appointed Andrea Reeb as special prosecutor for this specific case in a different district, who's been handling the press releases? This is not her district and she wasn't elected for it as prosecutor.

Mary Carmack-Altwies, DA for the first district NM court. This is her turf.

She must be a plant.
 
It's because Baldwin is a liberal and regularly mocked Trump. Explains their desire to have him locked up for as long as possible for a tragic accident. Meanwhile... Rittenhouse is a legend to them, who really did shoot to kill.

Based on the moral fiber displayed here from Konfab, I wouldn't be surprised.
 
If that is the case, why was the armourer also charged with two counts of involuntary manslaughter, she only held one position? Am fairly certain the charges relate two possible different kinds of manslaughter, not Alec Baldwin's roles on the film.

They will use multiple charges of different degrees, if you don't get them on the higher one you might get a conviction on a lesser count. Standard procedure.
 
Thanks, didn't know that, but she (Reeb) certainly isn't a lifelong democrat.

No she isn't and I wasn't referring to her, I was referring to the DA that appointed her as special prosecutor for this case. The DA is the one they called out for being a republican, the DA is the one that initiated all this and brought the charges and front and center in the media.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X